Will Ike Spike Another Round of Price Gouging?

With Hurricane Ike headed for South Texas -- some are predicting that greedy businesses will gouge people by charging unfair prices for necessary goods and services.

Yesterday, the Texas AAA issued a press release encouraging people to report any suspected gouging. They noted in past disasters hotels, gas stations and convenience stores have been caught taking advantage of other people's unfortunate situation during a disaster. Goods that frequently have their prices artificially raised include gas, drinking water, batteries and food.

The Texas AAA recommends that if you think you have been gouged to keep your receipts and file a report with the Texas Attorney General. The Texas Attorney General has already warned that gougers will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Reports can be filed by telephone at 1-800-252-8011.

While Texas is the obvious place price gouging might occur, concerns are already being raised in other States about this. News4Jax.com in Florida, WTHR.com in Indiana and WIS10 in South Carolina are all running stories on gas gouging. There is even concern in Canada that Hurricane Ike will spark a round of gouging up there.

Most of these articles recommend contacting your state's Attorney General if you have concerns about gouging. Reports can also be filed with the Department of Energy.

Besides filing a report, there are resources to ensure you are getting the most out of your hard-earned money in your area. GasBuddy.com is a online means of finding the best prices in both the United States and Canada. In Canada, there is an interesting tool from the CCPA (Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives) where you can see how much you are being gouged.

As a disclaimer, there are some who will argue that any suspected gouging is merely the result of natural events. Please note the people that argue this will probably be affiliated in some manner with Big Oil. Of course, other's might argue Big Oil has been gouging everybody for a long time. Of course, there is an argument that financial types have been playing around with the prices via speculation, also.

Sadly enough, despite a lot of frustration by the general public, Congress took off on vacation without addressing the public outcry on this issue. I'm not sure how much good reporting price gouging will do, but if enough people do, perhaps all the politicians crying foul about this issue will finally do something about it?

In my opinion, thus far, we've seen a lot of words but little action on this subject!

Yes we can protect the citizen from the Big Oil Scam!

Recently, I've written a couple of posts about energy speculation and why it's part of the reason for the current energy crisis. This occurs when speculators buy oil on paper with credit, the oil is never delivered and then we are told that supply and demand is driving the prices up.

Then all of a sudden, I read a story that Barack Obama is calling for an end to the speculation many believe is the cause of the out-of-control prices. Some think these high prices are being enabled by a law known as the "Enron Loophole." One would think that after studying all the fraud and financial misdeeds in the Enron scandal -- anything they pushed through Congress would have had action taken on it a long time ago?

Perhaps, I'm a bit of a conspiracy theorist, but having lived in California at the time of the Enron scandal -- I can see clear similarities between that time and now. Two of them are how it is hitting the pocketbook of the average person and that that the economic law of supply and demand is being used as an excuse.

From an article in the Washington Post by Anne E. Kornblut:

Sen. Barack Obama on Sunday rolled out a proposal to curb speculation in energy markets, a plan his advisers said would help stabilize soaring gas prices.

Obama proposed a four-step program that would, among other things, close a so-called "Enron loophole" that protects some energy futures trading from oversight by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, his advisers said.

The Washington Post article quoted the McCain camp as saying:

"The truth is Barack Obama is following John McCain's lead to close a Wall Street loophole that was signed into law by President Bill Clinton," McCain campaign spokesman Tucker Bounds said in a statement. "John McCain has supported bipartisan efforts to close this loophole and will work to address abuses in oil speculation. Barack Obama has voted the party line for Democrats who claim the loophole is fixed. The fact that Barack Obama is attacking John McCain, despite McCain's leadership on the issue, shows that Barack Obama is driven by the partisan attacks that Americans are tired of."

Do we have a reversal going on? Prior to this all we've seen are statements on conservation and allowing the oil companies to drill in places they weren't allowed to before.

Please note -- the quote from the McCain camp is partially true -- Mr. McCain has in the past supported legislation to close the Enron Loophole. The problem is that it's been awhile since he has brought up doing anything about it. Perhaps, Mr. Obama will make him remember his original concerns with the problem?

MSNBC's Keith Olbermann did an interesting story on this, which I first saw on my daughter's blog (RaleighRD.blogspot.com), which can be seen, here.

This investigative report points out that Ken Lay starting laying the ground work for the Enron Loophole under the first Bush administration with the blessing of then "new" U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission. The Enron Loophole was actually signed into law under the Clinton Administration.

Fast forward to the present and the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission is now going to host a International energy market manipulation conference to look into the speculation issue. Is this a sign that the Enron Loophole has gotten out-of-control?

It also points out that it is probable the speculators will do the same thing with alternative energy sources once they come into vogue.

Of course in all fairness to John McCain, he did vote with the minority in 2002-2003 to close this loophole.

Bill O'Reilly also did an interesting talking point on this subject last Wednesday called "Who Is Hurting You at the Gas Pump." Mr. O'Reilly made a great argument that a large percentage of the prices at the pump are being caused by greedy speculators and that the oil industry and OPEC are along for the ride.

Hopefully, Mr. Obama's statement will inspire the rest of the leadership in Washington to do the right thing and take a serious look at this problem.

In closing, those of us who remember the 70's need to remember we should have been taking a holistic approach to the energy problem long ago. We need to develop alternative sources and find ways to produce energy that aren't going to ruin the planet.

If we ignore the recent lessons on how volatile the energy market is -- there is little doubt we will see the problem in the future again -- and wonder why we didn't do anything about it NOW.

I hope this doesn't turn into a flurry of attacks between Mr. Obama and Mr. McCain. Wouldn't it be nice to see them join hands and do what is in the interest of the general public? I'd also like to see support in Washington to foster what should be a bi-partisan effort.

I'm pretty sure the voting public would appreciate this and should they fail to do so might express their frustrations when they exercise their right to vote!

Are we being gouged with hot gas?

Gas prices seem to keep going up, too frequently. According to ABC, buying gas could even be more expensive than what we see posted at the pump:

Consumers are feeling the pain at the pump, as gas prices have risen for nine straight weeks.

Now lawsuits around the country claim drivers are being ripped off in a gas gouge they can't even see.

There are at least nine lawsuits pending that claim some gas stations are padding their profits by selling warm gasoline.

According to the article, the cost impact of this might be:

An investigation by the Kansas City Star newspaper found that American drivers may overpay $2.3 billion a year, with drivers in warm states like California hit the hardest.

ABC News story, here.

Of course, the industry (petroleum) is arguing these statistics.

You can e-report suspected gas gouging to the DOE (Department of Energy) by linking, here.

DOE states that:

All complaints registered with the Department of Energy will be collated and transmitted to the Federal Trade Commission, U.S. Department of Justice and individual State Attorneys General for investigation and prosecution where appropriate.

Unfortunately, no one has ever been able to prove the oil companies were gouging consumers.

Still, the way they raise prices doesn't make a lot of sense to a layman like myself?

Meanwhile Reuters is reporting:

Occidental Petroleum's (OXY) chairman and chief executive took in more than $400 million in compensation last year, the company said in a filing, one of the biggest single-year payouts in U.S. corporate history.

Reuters story (courtesy of USA Today), here.