Is Bashing DHS for the Swift Raids Fair?

Suad Leija (courtesy of YouTube)

Recently, there were a lot of people bashing DHS because of the raids at the Swift meat packing plants. There were allegations that only 65 of those "detained" were charged with crimes, and that everyone else was "hard working and innocent." Of note, the associated press just reported that this number is up to 220, and DHS is still investigating. Just being here "illegally" is considered an "administrative matter," and not a "crime."

AP update, here.

Could this mean that some of the "fake identification" is of such "high quality" that it's taking time to establish criminal activity? It also might point out that the rights of those being charged are being considered, carefully.

After all, we live in a country, where people have rights.

DHS has maintained that the raids were part of a much larger investigation into organized crime and the mass production of fake identification.

I've always taken the stance that I have nothing against hard working people trying to make a better life for themselves, but that we can no longer afford to let criminals control our borders.

And besides hard-working citizens having their identities stolen, and used for illegal purposes, we have to consider the threat to national security. In 9-11 - several of the terrorists involved - used forged documents to enter the country and obtain legitimate identification.

In July, I did a post about how organized the mass production of fake identification is. According to the stepdaughter of one of the ringleaders of the organized crime ring behind it - they consider terrorism an "American problem."

The stepdaughter (Suad Leija) is now making the "YouTube" arena, and you can hear what she has to say, here.

CNN also did an interesting story (available on YouTube), which shows how easy it is for "anyone" to get fraudulent identification, here.

Also included is a lot of evidence that some of this fake identification is so good, it easily passes muster at a border crossing, or airports. Of note - the video shows card reading technology used a liquor store - which catches a lot of these fakes and points out that it isn't in use at our airports, or borders?

Maybe this is something DHS could look into, further?

I also did a post - where a writer from Colorado - who is an identity theft victim wondered aloud - if she was one of the people arrested at Swift?

I wonder if any of the critics of the Swift raids has had their identity stolen, and if this became the case, they would be so quick to judge the actions of DHS?

Should cats be issued credit cards?

In order to protect her privacy, my daughter used to use the dog's name to register on websites fond of data mining personal information (smart kid). Shortly thereafter, our dog (Oliver) started receiving a lot of junk mail. Included were pre-approved offers for credit-cards.

All of this correspondence went directly into a shredder and we had a good laugh about it. I had to "coach" my daughter not to use our "actual address" and the problem stopped.

Now Reuters is reporting that a woman in Australia used her cat's name to apply for a secondary credit-card, and was able to get a new account for the feline. The stated reason she did this was to prove that it's too easy to commit credit-card fraud.

Reuters quoted the woman (Katherine) as saying:

You don't need to hack into the internet when you can just steal someone's credit card number and create a card for yourself."

In fact, had Messiah been a fraudster - and not a feline - Katherine wouldn't even have known the card existed.

I wasn't notified that a second card had been issued. Messiah could have put a different address and the card would have been sent there and I wouldn't have known. If it's that easy for a cat to get credit, imagine what a dog could get.

Reuters story (courtesy of IBN), here.

There was another story, I blogged about, where journalists tested how much security there is when a credit card is issued:

Ever Wonder How Well the Credit Card Companies Protect Your Personal Information?

But my favorite story about credit being issued "too easily" (along with pictures) comes from Rob at Cockeyed.com, which can be seen - here.

Credit card fraud is a serious problem, which causes a lot of "pain and suffering" to anyone unfortunate enough to be impersonated.

Medical Identity Theft Could Kill

Recently, I've seen a lot written about Medical Identity Theft. There seems to be a lot of people getting bills for medical procedures they never received and subsequently going through a lot of "pain and suffering" to clear their good names.

And (it seems) organized criminal are getting involved in the activity, probably because it's a "profitable" enterprise with little danger of getting caught.

BusinessWeek online did an interesting article about this, where they said:

Yet the thief isn't always an individual desperately needing medical care. In some instances, the perpetrator can be a doctor hoping to pad his or her income by filing fraudulent claims. Even worse, law enforcement authorities say that more and more frauds are being perpetrated by organized crime rings who steal dozens, and sometimes thousands, of medical records, as well as the billing codes for doctors. The rings then set up fake medical clinics—offering free health screenings as a ruse to draw in patients—that submit bogus bills to insurers, collect payments for a few months, and then disappear before the insurers realize they've been had. (Dixon notes that health records now fetch $50 to $60 each on the black market, vs. a mere 7 cents for stolen résumés.)

BusinessWeek online article, here.

The BusinessWeek article quotes Pam Dixon, executive director of the World Privacy Forum, and rightfully so. The World Privacy Forum (to the best of my knowledge) was the first to call out this growing problem and has done quite a bit of work to determine the extent of it.

They have an entire page devoted to it on their site, here. I highly recommend it for anyone, who is, or might become a victim of this growing trend.

Based on their research, they have presented some key recommendations:

• Individuals’ rights to correct errors in their medical histories and files need to be expanded to allow them to remove false information from their files.
  
• Victims of medical identity theft should have the right to receive one free copy of their medical file.
  
• Individuals should have expanded rights to obtain an accounting of disclosures of health information.
  
• Notification of medical data breaches to consumers has the potential to save lives, protect health, and prevent losses.
  
• All working prototypes for the National Health Information Network need comprehensive risk assessments focused on preventing medical identity theft while protecting patient privacy.

The World Privacy Forum has also presented their finding to several government agencies, including the FTC.

This problem goes beyond the financial implications of identity fraud because it could cause great harm to victims, who have had erroneous medical information put in their medical histories. People could be improperly diagnosed, which might (in an extreme case) lead to their demise.

I did a previous post:

Tell it to the Identity Theft Task Force

Since the Federal Identity Theft Task Force is soliciting information from the public - this would be an appropriate place for someone to voice their thoughts (recommendations) about medical identity theft.

The Road Home for Katrina Victims is Frustrating

With all the allegations of "poorly spent money" in the hurricane disasters, it's become apparent that a lot of money hasn't reached the people, who need it.

For instance, take the "Road Home Program", which has paid a company called ICF International over $60 million to issue $4 million in checks. The program is intended to assist victims in getting back into "livable housing," and will manage the distribution of $7.5 billion in federal relief money.

ICF International is a "consulting firm" based in Fairfax, Virginia. According to Wikipeida, it's services have been used by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Energy, the United States Postal Service, and Housing and Urban Development.

The program has it's own website, which states:

The Road Home program was created by Governor Blanco, the Louisiana Recovery Authority, and the Office of Community Development. The program is funded by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

There has been a lot of criticism that ICF has been slow to fill positions for the project. Interestingly enough, there are a lot of positions (still not filled) advertised on their website.

The Times Picayune did an excellent assessment of the lack of program staffing, here.

The "Road Home" website also states that it dispels a lot of myths about the program, but it appears not everyone is "buying their version" of what is going on.

Because of the allegations of "mismanagement," the Louisiana House and Senate have passed two resolutions to terminate ICF's $756 million contract. They are also calling for an investigation into "possible conflicts of interest."

The Times Picayune reported:

The House and Senate, in separate unanimous votes, also passed House Concurrent Resolution 34 by Rep. Cedric Richmond, D-New Orleans, ordering a special legislative panel of New Orleans lawmakers and the Louisiana Recovery Authority -- the state agency overseeing recovery operation in the state -- to investigate ICF's handling of the contract. It was amended by Rep. Jim Tucker, R-Algiers, to also urge the federal Securities and Exchange Commission to probe ICF's public stock offering, shortly after winning the state contract, for possible conflicts of interest.

The Times Picayune article, here.

Sue Sturgis, who writes for Facing South, has also written some interesting commentary on the program.

Ms. Sturgis points out that ICF initially was involved in a contract to help the state decide how to spend federal grant money, which conceptualized the "Road Home Program." During this time frame, ICF decided to seek the "lucrative program administration project."

When the Louisiana Board of Ethics raised concerns that this contract might be perceived as giving ICF an unfair advantage in getting the larger contract, ICF ended the initial one. The payout for the first contract was $900,000, while the Road Home Program could pay ICF up to $756 million.

She also brings out other concerns the Board had with some of the banking relationships that were being proposed by ICF to administer the funds.

Facing South article, here.

Whether conflicts of interest exist remains to be seen. What can be clearly seen is that taxpayer money intended to help Katrina victims isn't getting to those who need it very quickly.

Red tape and excuses aren't going to be acceptable when there are a lot of people still living in "not very nice" conditions.

And until this matter is rectified, there are going to be "voices" calling for some "accountability."

Some of these voices are getting pretty loud.

This month, federal investigators plan to release audit results on contracts given to "so called" politically connected firms in the Katrina crisis. Speculation has it that these audits are going to reveal additional concerns about how money was squandered in the Katrina aftermath.