A look into labor abuses in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina

Photo courtesy of Ruffit at Flickr

It never ceases to amaze me that we keep seeing additional allegations of abuse, fraud and waste come to light as a result of the Katrina hurricane, and it's aftermath.

Brian Beutler of the Media Consortium (courtesy of AlterNet) wrote a pretty telling article of the abuses dealt to laborers, who went to New Orleans to assist in the reconstruction/clean-up effort.

Brian reports:

In the two years since the disaster, there have been thousands of testimonials -- issued to both government officials and private advocates -- about a wide taxonomy of abuses.The most frequent complaint workers cite is withheld wages, but almost as numerous are accusations of employee intimidation, toxic and hazardous working conditions, immigrant abuse, trafficking, exploitation and monetary extortion.

Many workers, who went to New Orleans were paid a small percentage of what they were promised:

On December 30, 2005, Wilson received $865 in pay for the 94 hours of work he did from November 20, through Dec 7. For a similar stretch between January 5 and January 18, he was paid only $206.10. In each case, he should have been paid about $1,500.

According to the article, the Bush Administration suspended affirmative action and documentation requirements for immigrant workers. They also removed the requirement to pay "prevailing wages."

The end result of this was that visiting American citizens and local residents were underbid by foreign workers, who probably weren't legal. Of course, no one can say this for sure because it wasn't checked out (very well) at the time. However if this wasn't the case why did Senator Mary Landrieu (Democrat LA)request that ICE agents be dispatched to look into the problem?

This resulted in even more people doing a dirty job not getting paid:

The result was astounding. On payday, subcontractors, faced with undocumented workers seeking cash, often called ICE to report their own operations, causing frightened workers to either scatter or face deportation to their home countries without pay.

Likewise, employee recruiters, dispatched by subcontractors to foreign countries, would offer often-destitute men and women the promise of good work and fair wages at any number of reconstruction jobs in New Orleans.

Congressman Dennis Kucinich held hearings into this to determine, whether or not the Department of Labor (DOL), did their job in controlling some of this abuse.

Many believe, they did not.

For those, who like me continue to be fascinated by the social issues in the Katrina disaster, Brian's full article can be read, here.

My personal opinion is that they need to be studied, carefully. A lot of citizens (and apparently non citizens) suffered, not because of a lack of resources, but because of what appears to be a "few greedy people."

I've written quite a bit about Katrina (in my own personal study of what went wrong). My previous posts can be read, here.

Another great place to learn more about the social issues surrounding Katrina is Margaret Saizan's Beyond Katrina.

Washington Post exposes another reason why Katrina victims are still suffering

The hurricane disasters, and their commentary on social issues, continue to amaze me. To me, the rest of the world can learn a lot by studying the ongoing problems related to the disaster.

The amount of money wasted, or lost to fraud (over a billion and growing) is a sad commentary, when a lot of the victims are still living in the now (infamous) FEMA trailers.

Now a new allegation is being brought forth, which is that $854 million in aid promised by our allies, wasn't even accepted. I find this pretty interesting as people are suffering nearly two years, afterwards?

Even more shameful was that expert search and rescue personnel, were turned down, immediately after the hurricane, when they probably would have been extremely helpful:

And while television sets worldwide showed images of New Orleans residents begging to be rescued from rooftops as floodwaters rose, U.S. officials turned down countless offers of allied troops and search-and-rescue teams. The most common responses: "sent letter of thanks" and "will keep offer on hand," the new documents show.

This fact, given the problems in the initial response, amazes me.

Original Washington Post article, here.

I wonder how our allies, many of who have accepted similar aid from us in the past, felt when we turned their generous offers down?

More recently, the Post is reporting that Congress intends to look into this. The article regarding this can be read, here.

I'm not sure when the story on Katrina will be over. The bottom line is that there are still a lot of hurricane victims, who could use a helping hand. A good place to learn more about this is Margaret Saizan's site (Beyond Katrina), which can be seen, here.

FEMA declares they are becoming stronger after realizing how much money was wasted in the hurricane disasters!

Hope Yen at the AP has written an article based on a report by the Inspector General at Homeland Security that $3.6 billion in contracts were awarded to companies with ties to the Republican Party rather than to local companies, impacted by the Katrina/Rita hurricanes.

She quotes Senator Dorgan, who requested the audit, as saying:

"This confirms what we already knew about FEMA — there was a staggering level of incompetence, and the victims of Katrina, as well as taxpayers, are taking it on the chin," Sen. Byron Dorgan (news, bio, voting record), D-N.D., who requested the audit, said Monday.

Dorgan, who chairs the Democratic Policy Committee, said that it was ironic that the new contracts were aimed at helping small businesses in the region get back on their
feet, but instead "some very big interests got some very lucrative contracts."

"There are a lot of things wrong with this, so this report should be a warning signal to Homeland Security and FEMA," he said.

Government investigators already estimate over $1 billion in losses due to waste.

FEMA's response was:

In response, FEMA in the report disagreed that the wide price variations put taxpayers at risk. The agency contended that it was comfortable with bidders' financial viability based in part on past performance. In cases where contract prices appeared unreasonably high, those would be offset with lower payments later on subsequent work orders, FEMA officials said.

FEMA spokesman Aaron Walker said Monday that the agency welcomed the audit's findings and was working hard on improvements to better perform its duties "while being a conscientious steward of taxpayer dollars." He said that FEMA contracting officers did a "remarkable job" given their short time frame.

The audit will assist in making "the new FEMA stronger, more flexible and cost-effective," Walker said in a statement.

Full AP story with links to the Homeland Security report, here.

Both sides can argue, but one thing is apparent, which is we probably could have done a lot more for the victims with the resources we spent!

If mistakes like this ($1 billion and counting) were made at a private organization, do you think the people making them would still be employed?

Probably, not very likely! Perhaps, I could get "the Donald" to comment, but that's not very likely, either.

The political climate on wasted government money is heating up. Recently, I blogged about $2 billion, allegedly wasted by a company (recently sold off by Halliburton) called KBR:

The case of an alleged $2 billion government contract fraud/abuse in Iraq/Afghanistan

In this case, it appears that we could have better served those, who are serving US!

Civil Servants under scrutiny for credit card abuses

Senator Grassley (Iowa) is introducing legislation to counter what he calls massive abuse with government credit cards.

He is quoted on his site as saying:

Every time we open these GAO reports we find more outrageous spending. Internet gambling and a Yankees baseball game don’t seem to be appropriate uses of tax payer money. The federal agencies don’t seem to be stepping up, so our legislation helps put some common sense controls on these credit cards.

The press release covers this in more detail:

Grassley said the legislation would also stipulate that cases of fraud be referred to the U.S. Attorney for prosecution and employees that egregiously misuse or commit fraud with a government charge card be fired. The bill would also increase oversight by providing that each agency Inspector General periodically conduct risk assessments and audits to identify fraud and improper use of credit cards.

Following the devastation of Hurricane Katrina, Grassley was concerned that provision raising the limit for emergency "micro-purchases" on government credit cards from $15,000 to $250,000 was ripe for waste, fraud and abuse and successfully fought to bring the limit back down. At the time, Grassley said that wasting taxpayer money does not help the victims of Hurricane Katrina.

Does this mean that government employees can commit fraud and waste taxpayer money without being fired, or prosecuted? If this happened in the private sector, the culprits would likely be fired and (possibly) prosecuted.

The sad thing is that Senator Grassley has attempted to introduce this legislation in the last two Congresses and it was never acted upon.

So far wasted taxpayer money not helping the Katrina victims, the GAO confirmed Senator Grassley's prediction. Here is a previous post on that matter:

More Allegations of Money Wasted in Katrina

Senator Grassley's press release on this matter, here.

Of note, Senators Norm Coleman of Minn., Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, and Susan Collins of Maine are supporting Senator Grassley in this legislation. Congressman Joe Wilson has filed similar legislation in the House of Representatives on government credit card abuse.

Civil servants should be held to at least the same standard as the people they are serving!

Should recent prosecutions for fraud in Katrina remind us of something?

Bruce Alpert, of the Times Picayune did an excellent article about a lot of recent prosecutions for fraud in the aftermath of the hurricane disasters.

One woman, LaWanda Williams collected $267,377.15 in an identity theft scheme using several other people's information.

I wonder if any of the people (who had their information stolen) were denied benefits, as a result of LaWanda's activities?

And LaWanda is just one example of people's greed. FEMA and Army Corps of Engineers officials, Red Cross employees and many others took advantage of the situation.

In fact, fraud was being committed as far away as California, where 71 cases have been documented.

Bruce Alpert's article, here.

Bruce's article points out that this isn't the first time fraud occurred after a disaster. Similar fraudulent claims occurred after 9-11 and the Tsunami disaster.

The money lost to fraud is a symptom of the larger problem, which was a disaster preparedness system that failed. The resulting confusion enabled a lot of fraud to occur, and probably made it too easy to commit.

I doubt any of the people now being prosecuted thought they were going to be caught.

As the old saying goes - "an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure." Our focus needs to be towards preventing this from happening again.

If you would like to learn more about the hurricane disaster - and how how people are still being "cured" two years after the fact - Beyond Katrina has a lot of information on the subject.

Will We Ever Discover the True Losses in the Katrina Disaster?

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has issued another report stating that the fraud losses in Katrina and Rita are a lot higher than previously disclosed to the public.

The report states:

• Almost $20 million in double payments was paid to people claiming damage to the same property in both hurricanes (Katrina and Rita).
• Almost $17 million in improper or fraudulent "rental assistance" payments given to people already receiving free housing.
• 500 foreign students received $3 million in aid.
• $156,000 was given to foreign workers on temporary visas.

Sadly enough, the report indicates that FEMA disabled a system (edit check in NEMIS) that would have caught people using duplicate information (social security numbers) to make claims in both hurricanes. In five of the six cases examined, the claimants didn't even have to provide proof that they had conducted repairs after receiving money for the first claim.

I have no personal experience with "edit check in NEMIS," but computers run pretty fast in today's world, and it doesn't make sense to me that an entire system designed to detect fraud was disabled?

Didn't we have enough personnel to do a manual check when duplicate social security numbers were noted? And even if this were so - why didn't FEMA take action (themselves) to identify the issues before the GAO investigated?

The use of other people's social security numbers is nothing new and probably could have been anticipated, fairly easily.

There is also a lot of missing equipment. The report shows that 34 percent of the property purchased to aid efforts has either been lost, or stolen. In the case of 2o flat bottom boats purchased - only two remain missing - however twice the retail price was paid to a vendor, who also failed to pay for 11 of the boats he sold to the government.

Even scarier, the report indicates that FEMA overstated the amount of found property reported in July hearings to Congress. This was based on an e-mail sent by DHS (Department of Homeland Security) on the eve of the hearings.

FEMA's estimate of the monetary impact of fraud in Katrina was $290 million, however if one is to believe the GAO report, the real losses surpass $1 billion.

With the stories that surfaced about prison inmates making claims and stolen information (social security numbers) being used in claims for addresses that were vacant lots - it's entirely possible that there is additional fraud that hasn't, or never will be discovered.

There were also a lot of stories of charities being defrauded and even fake charities being set-up. The GAO report only addresses the fraud losses incurred by the government.

GAO report, here.

Report Fraud, Waste and Abuse to the GAO, here.

FraudNET (Report Fraud, Waste and Abuse)

One might come to the conclusion that we wasted a lot of money on Katrina, but this is far from being true. In fact, a lot of people are still suffering as a result of these disasters, and the truth is that the money could have been used for better purposes.

I plan to explore this more in detail in future posts, but for now, I'll pass on a site that is devoted to the real victims in these disasters:

Beyond Katrina: The Voice of Hurricane & Disaster Recovery