Retailers Honor Sleuths Who Smashed $100 Million Organized Retail Crime Ring

The National Retail Federation is recognizing a couple of individuals, both from law enforcement and within their own ranks, for their contributions in smashing a $100 million organized retail crime ring. These crime fighters are being honored at the NRF Loss Prevention Conference & EXPO in Orlando, Florida.

The two being honored are Detective Ostojic, of the Polk Country Sheriff's Department, and Ron Averette from the loss prevention department at Publix Supermarkets. In June 2007, the two began comparing notes on a group that was stealing large amounts of merchandise. Subsequently, Detective Ostojic was able to tie in cases at other retailers and Averette (along with Ostojic) presented the pattern of activity to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement and Florida State Attorney's Office. This led to a task force being formed under the leadership of Special Agent Telly Sands from the Florida Department of Law Enforcement.The result of the task force's efforts were that 18 people were identified as being involved in the ring and subsequently arrested.

The FBI estimates that organized retail crime costs retailers an estimated $30 billion dollars a year. To date, this is the largest documented case where organized retail crime was identified as being the cause.

These rings use flea markets, Internet auction sites like eBay and Craigslist, rogue e-commerce sites, and even seedy merchants to sell their goods. Some retail loss prevention departments have dedicated personnel to investigate stolen merchandise on auction sites.

In this case, a lot of the stolen merchandise were health and beauty aids. Some of these products have expiration dates, which might lead to health and safety concerns for the end user.

Mark Albright wrote an article about this case in the Saint Petersburg Times, where he mentioned specific brands the group deemed desirable for resale. By doing a search on eBay, I found a wide selection of Gillette razor blades, Prilosec, Crest WhiteStrips, and Oil of Olay available on the site. Please note that I have no way of telling if these items were the result of organized retail crime or obtained legitimately. I do know that large companies generally frown on having their products sold on auction sites and I saw some extremely good prices listed for these products.

According to the article in the Saint Petersburg Times some of the shoplifters (boosters) involved have rap sheets (criminal records) ranging from sex crimes to armed robbery and attempted murder.

A recent survey indicated that retailers are seeing an increase in organized retail crime activity. The cost of this type of crime is eventually added into the cost of the product being stolen, which means we all end up paying for it.

This activity has been known to run smaller businesses bankrupt. Even at larger retail organizations, out of control losses often dictate that operating budgets need to be trimmed. Since payroll is often the largest operating cost in an organization, this leads to reductions in hours and positions to keep a company afloat. Simply stated, activity like this can cost people their jobs.

Legislation has been passed in many states and more is forthcoming to make organized retail crime penalties stiffer.

NRF Survey shows Organized Retail Crime activity is growing!

According to FBI estimates, Organized Retail Crime (ORC) is a $30 billion a year business. The National Retail Federation's 2008 Organized Crime Survey shows another alarming trend, which is that the amount of e-fencing to sell stolen merchandise on auction sites like eBay and Craigslist has grown 6 percent.

Also mentioned in the survey are shady e-commerce sites being put up on the Internet to fence the proceeeds of ORC.

In case you've never heard the term, Organized Retail Crime, here is a good description of the activity:

Organized retail crime (ORC) refers to groups, gangs and sometimes individuals who are engaged in illegally obtaining retail merchandise through both theft and fraud in substantial quantities as part of a commercial enterprise. These crime rings generally consist of “boosters” who methodically steal merchandise from retail stores and fence operators who convert the product to cash or drugs, as part of the criminal enterprise. Some of the more sophisticated criminals engage in changing the UPC bar codes on merchandise so they ring up differently at checkout, this is commonly called “ticket switching.” Others use stolen or cloned credit cards to obtain merchandise or produce fictitious receipts to return products back to retail outlets.

The report acknowledges that these groups are using cloned credit cards to steal merchandise and or get the necessary receipts to refund the merchandise for cash.

In the wake of the TJX data breach, where up to 94 million personal and financial records were hacked, a group was caught in Florida using data from the breach (cloned cards) to buy a reported $8 million worth of gift cards.

Please note that TJX is hardly the only retailer, or financial services institution that has had personal and financial records hacked from their systems in recent history. Attrition.org does a good job of recording the known breaches on their Data Loss Database - Open Source .

Although not addressed in the current report, I suspect the use of fraudulent checks are used to obtain merchandise and receipts, also.

This could be fueled by another organized crime activity. Portable technology has made the counterfeiting of identification documents another growing trend. Over the past two years or so, I've had the pleasure of being able to speak with Suad Leija and her husband about this organized criminal activity on a semi-regular basis. Suad, the step-daughter of one of the top players in this game was recruited in an intelligence operation and eventually exposed a cartel operating throughout North America to the government. Prosecution of members of the cartel is ongoing in this case and Suad is currently working on a book.

These documents, which are available throughout the United States, can be easily used to support both check and refund fraud by using names that get past the data bases designed to protect retailers from these types of fraudulent activity.

Portable technology is also being used to clone payment cards and some of it is easily found on auction, or shady e-commerce sites set up to sell these devices. As of this writing, I was easily able to find credit card encoders for sale on eBay. A site called HackersHomePage.com provides an array of devices that could be used to steal and produce payment (credit/debit) cards. They also provide tools to make counterfeit checks and even, paper for fake prescriptions. They do have a "disclaimer" stating that none of their products are to be used for illegal purposes, but it is pretty obvious someone could.

There is no doubt that there is a lot of technology that is enabling a lot of criminal activity out there!

NRF's Vice President of Loss Prevention, Joe LaRocca, made what I consider a sage comment on this activity:

“Law enforcement and retailers alike are fed up with organized retail crime rings and are stepping up efforts to stop them in their tracks,” said NRF Vice President of Loss Prevention Joseph LaRocca. “The brazen and unethical behavior of organized retail crime suspects results in possible health risks for consumers, adds unnecessary fees to consumers’ purchases and funds criminal enterprises, including the mob and terrorist organizations around the world.”

When I stated that this activity hurts all of us, the reason is that retailers have to make up the $30 billion they are losing to this activity somewhere. This normally equates to higher prices, or in extreme circumstances (especially in tight economic times) cutting payroll. Simply stated, people might be losing their jobs because of this activity.

So far as health risks, the report sums up the obvious risks rather well:

For example, criminals may not keep stolen merchandise in a temperature-controlled environment, so merchandise like baby formula and over-the-counter medicines can easily spoil. When criminals sell these items online through third party auction sites consumers are left with no way to guarantee they are getting safe and reliable healthy and beauty products.

I decided to see if I could find baby formula on eBay. As you can see - there seems to be a lot of it for sale on the site at discounted prices. At the time I checked 26 pages of it were for sale on the site.

Actual cases in the report that support how organized this activity has become are a $60-$100 million dollar case in Florida involving health, beauty, cosmetic products and over-the-counter medicines. Another case mentioned involved a high ranking member Gambino Crime Family and a sophisticated ticket/UPC switching case and extortion. In this case, a planted employee was making up the labels and providing temporary credit cards to move the merchandise through point-of-sale systems.

Recent initiatives to combat Organized Retail Crime include launching LerpNET, which is a crime database available to both retailers and law enforcement. Also highlighted was legislation against ORC throughout the country to "reduce the rewards and increase the risk" to the groups involved in it. Several States have already passed this legislation and more are considering it.

Full 2008 ORC Survey, here.

SIRAS offers guarantee that it will reduce retail crime

The reason SIRAS' product registration and smart return service perked my interest is because it protects people's privacy and is an effective means of reducing losses.

SIRAS tracks an inanimate object (merchandise) instead of a customer's personal information.

Now they are now offering a "guarantee" the technology will add dollars to a organization's bottom line by reducing fraudulent returns.

In their own words from the press release regarding this matter:

Electronic Product Registration, is putting its money where its mouth is with a unique Return On Investment (ROI) Guarantee for any company using SIRAS’s product registration and Smart Return service to manage their product returns and warrantees. The program, designed to eliminate any risk for companies interested in implementing SIRAS’s technology, guarantees that over the course of a year companies will save more money through deflected product returns than it spends in transaction fees.

In case you haven't had to refund any merchandise in a long time, most retailers require you to give them your personal statistics before they approve your return.

This information is all maintained in a database, where it might be exposed to a hacker, or probably more frequently, dishonest employee. Information is worth a lot of money to anyone, who knows where to sell it.

A dishonest Certegy employee recently got caught selling 8.5 million people's information to an undisclosed data-broker. Since the mysterious data-broker still hasn't been identified -- despite being listed as a co-conspirator in court filings -- we really aren't sure where these records went?

Certegy provides check verification services for a lot of merchants.

Personal and financial information is marketed in carder forums (chat rooms) on the Internet. Anonymous payment methods, such as wire transfers, PayPal and eGold add to the problem. They make it relatively easy to buy and sell stolen information.

It also isn't unknown for criminal organizations to plant, or recruit employees to steal information from within an organization.

The press release quotes Peter Junger (SIRAS CEO) as saying, "And in all cases, regardless of ROI, clients retain all of the valuable POS data collected."

This POS data also serves another important purpose. If the merchandise is found in a fencing operation, or on an auction site, it can still be tracked to the point-of-compromise.

This opens up opportunities to recover stolen merchandise and makes it more dangerous for the criminals fencing it.

Mesa Police Department tested these capabilities with SIRAS and FOX News did a story on it, which can be seen, here.

The technology, when deployed properly with a point-of-sale system can also identity fraudulent means of tender used to purchase merchandise.

SIRAS technology can be deployed by a merchant, or at the factory, itself.

They already makes their database available to law enforcement free-of-charge.

With all the identity theft and counterfeit ID available, using SIRAS reduces the possibility that an innocent customer will be wrongfully identified as an "undesirable" in a refund database.

Saying that, who knows how much of the information in these databases is one-hundred percent accurate anymore? With retail crime becoming more and more organized, the possibility exists that it is NOT.

One of the systems targeted in the TJX data-breach was their refund database. The information in this database is probably worth more than simple financial information because it contains the elements necessary to assume a person's identity.

It's relatively easy to shut down a bank account, or credit card number. Once a person's statistics are compromised, they can be at risk of identity theft for a long time.

Data breaches are becoming more expensive. TJX claimed a loss of $118 million in their second quarter earnings. Estimates vary widely on exactly how expensive data-breaches will become, but everyone agrees the cost of them is going up.

SIRAS seems more effective in resolving property crimes because it tracks the property, itself. It also protects customer privacy and protects a merchant from becoming the victim of a data-breach.

I doubt that SIRAS would make this guarantee if they weren't absolutely certain of the results. If they were wrong, I doubt they would be in business very long.

Press release from SIRAS, here.

Gift card due diligence 101

According to most statistics, the buying public spent approximately $100 billion on gift cards last year. Because of their popularity, gift cards are used to commit fraud fairly frequently, also.

Retail criminals use fraudulent credit cards, debit cards and checks to buy large amounts of gift cards. Since a lot of sites exist, where anyone can sell these cards, criminals can turn them into cash fairly easily.

Shortly after the much talked about TJX data breach -- where 90 million personal and financial records were compromised -- a group was caught in Florida buying $8 million in gift cards using credit card numbers stolen in the data breach.

In another method to commit fraud, cards are picked up off a display and taken to a more private location in the store. The numbers and PINs are then recorded -- either with a portable card skimmer, or written down by hand. The people doing this then simply call in to check the value of a particular card, and use them when they discover they've been activated.

I've seen articles written on this that recommend buying cards from behind a counter. While this may be safer, we have to remember that most retailers have a problem with dishonest employees. This is more prevalent during the holiday season, when retailers hire a lot of temporary help.

In wouldn't be too far fetched to have a dishonest employee skim the details of these cards and drain them when they are activated.

There have also been reports of employees stealing credit card numbers and then using them to activate gift cards.

A couple days ago, TwinCities.com did a story about a Target employee stealing $19,500 in gift cards.

Since gift cards can be purchased on the Internet, fraudulent payment devices are used to purchase them on websites, also.

I would be extremely wary of buying any gift card on an auction, or gift card site. These sites rarely offer very much protection for people using them. It is a lot safer to visit the site that issues the cards, if you prefer shopping on the Internet.

Simply stated, a gift card purchased on a third-party website might not work, might not have the advertised value, or you might never receive what you bought.

I'm not saying not to buy gift cards. Being a lazy shopper, I buy them myself. Saying that, here are some tips to make sure you are getting what you pay for:

Make sure you buy them from a reputable retailer.

Keep your receipt and if possible, use a credit card to purchase them. Credit cards offer a little extra protection if there is a problem.

Inspect any card you buy for signs that it has been tampered. If the card is in a cardboard holder remove it and inspect it, the PIN should be protected up with a plastic coating that has to be scratched off.

Please note that if you work at a reputable retailer be wary of people returning gift cards. Stolen blank cards are often replaced for the cards that were previously activated.

I haven't seen anything come out about gift card fraud from the National Retail Federation (NRF) this year yet, but here is an interesting press release they released on the matter last year.

TJX class action settlement only addresses about one percent of the total people compromised

Friday evening, MarketWatch announced that TJX -- who suffered a data breach compromising over 45 million of their customers --has agreed to settle the class action lawsuits that were filed against them after the data breach was disclosed.

The class action lawsuits referred to were filed in both the United States and Canada.

Since most of the financial losses have been incurred by financial institutions -- who had to reissue the compromised cards and settle the fraud claims -- this settlement appears to primarily address the customers compromised by the breach of TJX's refund database.

This would amount to about 455,000 people, or one percent of the total number of people compromised.

Another issue that is still pending is how information is stored, and who will be responsible for paying for the administrative costs arising from data breaches in the future. Consumers Union is pushing that one of these bills, already passed in California, be signed into law. Minnesota has already passed legislation that addresses this.

MarketWatch reports:

Under the settlement, which is subject to court approval, TJX will offer three years of credit monitoring and identity theft insurance to customers who returned merchandise without a receipt and to whom the company sent letters reporting that their driver's licenses or other identifying information may have been compromised.

TJX will also reimburse the customers for documented costs of certain license replacements and certain losses from identity theft if identification numbers compromised were the same as their Social Security numbers.

The company will hold a one-time three-day customer appreciation event, in 2008 or later, at which prices will be reduced by 15%.

One thing that concerns me is that the settlement offer states that one of the requirements to receive compensation will be that the identification number compromised has to match their Social Security number.

I guess that TJX and their affiliates don't want to address the rising phenomenon of synthetic identity theft? When synthetic identity theft is committed different parts of a persons identity are crafted to create a new one.

Stephen Coggeshell of ID Analytics was recently quoted as saying:

Five years ago, this crime was hardly seen. Eighty-five to 90 percent of identity fraud is really this synthetic ID fraud, as opposed to the true name identity theft.

Just because the identity and the Social Security number were not compromised together doesn't assure that that the person involved will not become a victim.

This led me to wonder how many Social Security numbers could have been compromised? The answer was right on a FAQ sheet on the TJX site:

We do not receive or store customer social security numbers per se. However, the drivers' license or military ID numbers customers provide us in unreceipted merchandise return transactions are, in some cases and in some states, the same numbers as their social security numbers. We are writing directly to customers we were able to specifically identify whose drivers' license, military or state ID numbers, together with their names and addresses, were found in the information believed compromised and identifying where we believe those numbers may be social security numbers.

Laws have been passed that prohibit the practice of placing Social Security numbers on identification documents.

In the identity theft world -- which is what the concern about this data breach is all about, when a SSN or SIN (in Canada) is compromised -- the criminal compromising the information has all the information necessary to complete a full identity assumption.

In the dark world of Internet forums that sell this information, a complete identity (SSN, or SIN included) is often referred to as a "full." The complete information on a person is simply worth a little more money to the criminals purchasing it.

Retail criminals, who causes billions in losses a year, often refund the merchandise to launder the proceeds of their efforts into cash. This was the very reason -- most retailers implemented databases to track the information of people, who show up at refund desks -- a little too frequently.

With the increasing availability of fake identification and bogus financial instruments -- already being used at retailers to steal merchandise, with a focus on high-value items that are locked up -- it's likely that a lot of the information in these databases isn't completely accurate.

I would guess that the same people, using the bogus financial instruments, purchase the merchandise with them and then head to the refund counter.

So far as the TJX offer to settle this portion of their liability, it still has to be accepted by the court. Of even greater importance is that retailers need to take a hard look at how these refund databases are protected -- and -- whether or not, they are as effective in stopping refund fraud as they used to be.

For more information on the issue of using Social Security numbers on identification documents, the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse has a document, here.

The University of California submitted an interesting document to the Federal Trade Commission on the subject of synthetic identity theft, which can be seen, here.

Last, but not least, Tom Fragala at Truston put together a pretty neat blog post with a lot of references about synthetic identity theft, here.

Former IRS employee charged with a different type of refund fraud

With the deadline to file our taxes almost upon us, the term refund fraud, normally is associated with filing a fraudulent tax refund. A former IRS employee, Robert Dooley has been charged a different type of refund fraud (retail). The stated losses in this case were $330,000.

Dooley allegedly stole merchandise and refunded it in nine states (he gets around), using his IRS identification to intimidate (my best guess) Home Depot employees.

Many retailers allow returns without a receipt if identification is presented. The practice of maintaining this information in data bases, which might be hacked has been a concern with privacy advocates, recently.

I examined this issue in a recent post on what some retailers are doing to protect themselves without data mining information (SIRAS technology), here.

Refund fraud is estimated to cost retailers $16 billion a year based on a study conducted by Dr. Richard Hollinger at the University of Florida.

In many instances, Dooley received gift cards, which retail crooks often turn into cash, using a variety of methods.

Reuters story on this matter, here.

Their article suggests that Dooley would pick up the merchandise and head directly to the return counter. This is a common way retail criminals perform a fraudulent refund.

This isn't the first time in recent history a civil service type was involved in this activity. A little over a year ago, I did a post on a former Bush advisor doing fraudulent refunds:

Former Bush Advisor Arrested on Shoplifting Allegations

And civil servants aren't the only public figures that have been caught shoplifting.

(Winona Ryder photo courtesy of Wikipedia)

Retailers and the FBI band together to fight organized crime

Communication is probably the most effective tool in fighting financial crimes, especially those of the organized sort. Financial crooks (scam artists) thrive on a lack of communication and knowledge.

The retail industry realizes this and in partnership with the FBI is launching a secure tool that businesses and law enforcement can use to communicate criminal activity with each other. A simple, but powerful principle.

Here is the information on this new tool from the NRF site:

In response to an alarming rise in organized retail crime, the National Retail Federation and the Retail Industry Leaders Association, in collaboration with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, have teamed up to launch the Law Enforcement Retail Partnership Network (LERPnet), a secure national database that will allow retailers to share information through its unique web-based design. With LERPnet, retailers and law enforcement will be able to fight back against illegal activity including organized retail crime, burglaries, robberies, counterfeiting, and online auction fraud. The database will launch on April 9, 2007.

Full NRF press release, here.

More information on this tool can be seen by linking, here.

The Washington Post also did a good story covering this.

A lot of other industries and law enforcement agencies should follow this example. Developing better tools to communicate could help resolve the current epidemic, currently being seen in all types of financial crimes.

There is some evidence that the bad guys communicate with each other, regularly (carder forums). The good guys should do no less!

To close, Joe LaRocca, NRF vice president of loss prevention is saying:

“With this system, retailers are banding together with law enforcement to send a clear message to criminals: We will not tolerate your behavior and we will stop you.”

Organized retail criminals sell their ill-gotten proceeds in many places

Organized retail crime is becoming a "buzz word" within the retail security industry. Because of this fact, many large retailers employ dedicated specialists to deal with the issue.

Some estimates (RILA) reflect that this could be a $34 billion a year problem.

I've seen a lot of recent stories about merchandise being fenced on auction sites. Although, this is a big problem, stolen goods are fenced in other places, also.

WKYC news (Ohio) is reporting that 19 homes and business were recently raided, illustrating how organized some of this activity can be.

Very interesting video, here.

The Washington Post, did an interesting article about organized retail crime in 2005, here.

It noted that federal law enforcement is getting involved in the prosecution of these cases, because of their impact, and (probably) the fact that they cross state lines, frequently.

RILA (The Retail Industry Leaders Association) proposed changes to Congress to deal with the problem, here.

Of note, they quote the FBI as saying that organized retail crime is funding terrorist organizations.

Another problem (the FBI calls out) is when outdated medicine and items, such as baby formula are repackaged and sold as new.

This could pose significant health risks to those, who purchase these stolen items.

Besides the fact that we all pay for this with our hard earned money (higher prices), our safety is being compromised by these criminals, also.

Store Detective Discovers Traveling Credit Card Ring

I came across an interesting story about how a store detective at Target caught a group of traveling credit card fraudsters in Washington.

The store detective noted suspicious behavior - customers purchasing large amount of gift cards and did a little checking. When he did, he discovered that the cards being used were counterfeits.

When the merry trio was arrested at a bank down the street, police discovered maps to area retailers, a lot of counterfeit credit cards and - of course - gift cards.

After being identified, the authorites determined that the fraudsters had traveled to Washington from California.

The fraudsters claim that they were using the gift cards to buy things for themselves. Let see, they travel from California to Washington and use numerous counterfeit credit cards to obtain merchandise for themselves?

And the authorities aren't buying their story either -- they are being charged with "leading organized crime."

My guess is that they were going to find a way to convert the gift cards to cash. I recently wrote about the problems associated with gift card fraud and how they are being fenced on auctions all over the Internet:

Why Buying Gift Cards on Auction Sites isn't a Good Idea

Normally - I write from a broader perspective - but this story illustrates how we might be rubbing elbows with some fairly sophisticated "criminal types," while out doing our Christmas shopping.

Jeremy Palowski of the Olympian wrote the story, which attracted my attention to this, here.

Why Buying Gift Cards on Auction Sites isn't a Good Idea

I recently did a post wondering if sites reselling gift cards would create an additional avenue for dishonest people to commit fraud. After all - gift card fraud - isn't new and eBay limits the sales of them on their sites because of the criminal activity associated with them.

The main reason eBay limited the sales on their site was pressure from the retail industry, or so I've read.

Fraud committed against retailers costs billions, and it's added into the "cost of goods sold," which means we are all paying higher prices because of it. There is a limit to being able to add the price of fraud into the cost of an item (competition) and when this happens, businesses fail.

A lot of people have lost their jobs when retail fraud couldn't be controlled.

In response to my original post, Joe LaRocca, Vice President of Loss Prevention for the National Retail Federation was kind enough to send me some links illustrating how big a problem this has become.

In November, the NRF released information that estimates retailers will lose $3.5 billion during the holiday (Christmas) season - link here.

Many retailers issue gift cards versus cash for refunds (especially when no receipt is present) and fraudsters sell them for cash. Joe provided me with an interesting link on this (story and video clip) from NBC4.com, here.

Refund fraud normally is a result of shoplifting, but when dealing with gift card fraud, we also need to include credit/debit card and check fraud. Retail fraudsters buy gift cards with their "bogus financial instruments" and then sell the cards for cash. Of course - they could be refunding merchandise bought with their bogus instruments - but it's easier (less work) for them to simply buy the "gift cards" and resell (fence) them.

Credit/debit card and check fraud are two activities that directly tie into "identity theft," which victimizes 9 million people a year in the United States, alone.

Besides the "indirect costs" we all pay - a lot of ordinary people become fraud victims after an encounter with a fraudster on an auction site. The Internet Crime Complaint Center cites auction fraud as their number one complaint and it keeps growing every year.

Besides placing yourself at risk - buying gift cards over the Internet - might be supporting the victimization of ordinary people and businesses alike!

Will Gift Card Sites Become a Fraud Problem?

This morning, I read a story in the San Jose Mercury about organized retail theft - which mentioned how shoplifting gangs are stocking up for the Christmas season.

The story quoted Joseph LaRocca, of the National Retail Federation:

"Goods stolen by organized or professional thieves are sometimes sold cheaply at flea markets, on street corners or in impromptu home boutiques, say retail security experts. They can end up as fraudulent returns to stores. And in a high-tech age, they can be "e-fenced'' on online auction sites."

Also mentioned was how gift cards are being bought and stolen with fraudulent checks and credit cards.

Not mentioned in the article is the fact that gift cards are also issued as refunds when someone doesn't have a receipt and that "hackers" have been able to load "blank cards" in the past.

And new "gift-card auction sites" seem to be popping up all over the Internet.

Marshall Loeb of MARKETWATCH recently did a story on these sites, which attributed this new trend to consumers not using up their old cards. While this might be true -- gift card fraud is nothing new -- and I have to wonder how many cards sold on these sites were the result of one fraudulent transaction, or another?

And even the article states that consumers should be wary:

Consumer advocates warn that you should be careful when doing business on these sites. There is virtually no way to avoid fraud completely; a seller could post and sell cards that have no value. Some sites have built in safeguards to prevent this from happening. CardAvenue.com, for example, validates cards listed at more than $100 and will cover up to $100 of a card's value if it proves to be a dud (you have to pay a $10 deductible, though).

After reading this, I had another thought, which was that eBay warns people all the time not to do off-eBay transactions, but they do anyway - and there are many of them who become fraud victims.

It's amazing what a few "too good to be true deals" will harvest in the way of victims.

Will we see the same thing on these "gift card sites?"

A couple of years ago - eBay limited the number of cards that could be sold by any one seller - as a result of all the fraud and some pressure by corporate victims (retailers).

Now - it seems - that these gift card sites are stepping into to fill the "void" left by eBay's change in policy.

A lot of these sites are too new to have developed a history, but given the history of gift cards being tied into fraud - it's probably a matter of time before we see problems.

I would strongly recommend that buyer's be careful (caveat emptor) and that the "retail industry and law enforcement" keep a "watchful eye" on these sites.

Of course - my guess - is that they already are!

A closing thought is that even if the cards work - if they were a result of a fraud transaction - we all end up paying for it in the end.

Businesses wouldn't stay in business otherwise.

If you are interested in how much gift card fraud there is out there, click on the title of this post.

Retailers Find their Stolen Merchandise for Sale on eBay

Shoplifting costs retailers billions of dollars a year and we all pay for it in the form of higher prices. On the low end, you have teenagers and opportunists "boosting" merchandise. Moving up the retail theft food chain you have people supporting drug habits and even organized gangs, who steal from retailers on a larger scale.

A common misconception is that the majority of losses stem from individuals stealing items for their own use. In fact, the majority of stolen goods are converted into cash.

With the increased focus on the traditional means of converting stolen merchandise into cash, such as refunding, common and professional "boosters" are flocking to eBay to accomplish their primary goal.

This was a matter of concern raised at the Retail Fraud Conference held in London recently. Penelope Ody of the Retail Bulletin reports:

Retailers at this week's Retail Fraud conference in London (May 4) had a new preoccupation adding to the usual concerns over dishonest cashiers, sweethearting and back door delivery thefts-eBay. According to Boots head of loss prevention and security, Robert Jennings, this is now in the top five areas of concern as retailers increasingly see their merchandise offered in bulk on the web auction site.

Link, here.

Note that the Jennings is saying for "offered in bulk," which would lead one to speculate that this isn't being done by the "opportunists" and is more likely the work of organized gangs.

Interestingly enough, there has been a lot of buzz recently on organized gangs involved in shoplift activity. Margaret Pressler of the Washington Post recently wrote:

Retailers and theft experts say criminals have discovered that large profits can be made relatively easily, and without much risk, by stealing merchandise from crowded, understaffed stores. They say the most stolen items tend to be high-priced, widely used products that are routinely sold in chain stores: over-the-counter medicines, razors, film, CDs and DVDs, baby formula, diapers, batteries, hair-growth and smoking-cessation products, hardware, tools, designer clothes and electronics.

Link, here.

AND another recent viewpoint from SecurityInfoWatch.com might lead one to believe that organized retail crime has ties to illegal immigration and terrorisim.

Liz Mart'nez wrote:

According to CIS Robert W. Nolen, a lead trainer in a course developed with Bureau of Justice Assistance grant money called "Understanding, Combating, and Surviving Terrorism," many criminals from terrorist countries specialize in the re-sale of stolen consumer goods. The profits from these enterprises are used to fund terrorist activities.

In many cases, men and women from El Salvador, Honduras and Mexico travel together, doing the actual stealing. Each person in the crew has a particular area of expertise, whether it be distracting store employees, doing the actual boosting, or driving the get-away vehicle. These professional thieves often earn $3,000 a week.

Link, here.

Although not stated in the article, if illegal immigrants are doing the stealing and criminals from terrorist countries are selling the goods, it makes me wonder how close their relationships could be?

Another issue, retailers have had with eBay is the sale of gift cards on the site. Whether purchased with bogus financial instruments, or issued as refunds (which could be a direct result of shoplifting), gift cards are another means of converting stolen proceeds into cash.

In another interesting article, again from the Washington Post, Ariana Cha wrote:

The shoplifters discovered some stores would allow them to return the goods without receipts for store credit or gift cards. They then sold those vouchers on the giant online marketplace. It was easy, instant and anonymous. The money flowed in -- they got 76 cents per dollar of stolen merchandise, a huge takeaway considering that shoplifters traditionally net 10 percent or less of the retail value of the items. The group made more than $200,000 in 10 months.

This is yet another example of many, where crimes of all sorts are occurring in the Internet auction world (particularly eBay). We can't hold auction sites accountable for being in collusion with criminals, but we can hold them accountable for not providing a safe shopping environment.

After all, how long would one of these retailers survive if they allowed the amount of crime to occur within their four walls with people walking around? My guess is that they would be out of business pretty quickly.

The same standard needs to be applied to the Internet and if this "business model" is to survive, the auctioneers needs to wake up and smell the coffee. Thus far, eBay has been able to blame everyone, but themselves; however as corporations become victims, the stakes are likely to grow.

Corporations have money and can afford a lot of lawyers.

Tiffanys might have already started this trend with it's pending litigation regarding the sale of counterfeit merchandise on eBay.