If there were ever a modern case that could be compared to the Salem witch trials, it would be the effort to prosecute Julie Amero, a Norwich, Connecticut school teacher for (allegedly) exposing her students to pornography.
Julie was convicted on four counts of exposing kids to pornography after she turned on a spyware-infested (school-owned) machine and a flurry of porn pop-ups began appearing on the screen. Julie, who was merely a substitute teacher, didn't know what to do and the teenagers in her class witnessed the event.
Even worse, the school district had let their content filtering software expire. Computer experts later discovered the spyware infestation was caused by someone accessing a hairdressing site. Presumably, this site was accessed by a student, who wasn't aware of the spyware and didn't know the school district had let their content filtering expire.
On Friday, Alex Eckelberry, CEO of Sunbelt Software, announced that the Amero nightmare is over in his popular Sunbelt Blog. Sadly though, she still had to plead to a misdemeanor charge of disorderly conduct. The result was a $100 fine and she has had her teaching credentials revoked in Connecticut.
Considering in the initial trial she was facing a conviction on four felony counts — which could have netted her 40 years in the slammer — I suppose this is a win?
"She acquiesced to the lesser misdemeanor charge, and while it may have been a bitter pill to swallow, she can at least can move on now without this sick cloud hanging over her head. It was less than two years ago that Julie was facing felony charges with a maximum of 40 years in prison," according to Alex Eckelberry,
Alex and a host of people from the computer security industry, along with a pro bono attorney, William Dow, led the effort to expose this injustice and get Julie a new trial. The number of people who got involved in this is amazing and many of them are mentioned in Alex's blog post.
I found this case amazing since malicious and even so-called commercial sites infest unprotected machines with all kinds of "ware" on a daily basis. In this case, it was the industry that protects computers from unwanted "ware" that had to step in and educate the authorities that there was a problem with the intent in the case. Perhaps the authorities should have hired someone a little more knowledgeable in computers in the first place before attempting to prosecute Julie.
Sadly, Julie's health has been failing as a result of the stress induced by this prosecution. Even sadder, with all the real crime on the Internet, which rarely ever results in a prosecution, a lot of taxpayer money was wasted going after someone who most believe was completely innocent!
I've written a few posts about the Julie Amero story. It's ironic that Internet porn, which is allegedly controlled by organized crime, translated into a teacher being charged for turning on a computer for the first time. Even more ironic is that in those four years, very few, if any, of the people behind the actual problem have been brought to justice. Also, ironic was a WebMD survey that found that Internet porn reaches most children, including the age of the teenagers present in Julie's class that day. The truth is that most of the teenagers in the class have probably seen worse, unless they've never surfed the sometimes murky waters of the Internet.
The ironies in this case are many and in the end, history will write it that way.
Showing posts with label Internet Crime. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Internet Crime. Show all posts
Sunday, November 23, 2008
Wednesday, July 23, 2008
Will One Spam King's Conviction and Another's Escape Mean Less E-Trash on the Internet?
Robert Soloway dubbed the "Spam King" was sentenced in Washington yesterday, according to an article in the Seattle Intelligencer.
For his misdeeds, Soloway was sentenced to just under four years. Notably, Soloway was the second person to be prosecuted under the Can-Spam Act. It should also be noted that the prosecutors asked for about twice the time in prison and with good behavior, Soloway will probably only serve about half of the sentence he received.
Like most of the many "Spam Kings" out there, Soloway allegedly used a botnet (army of zombie computers) to saturate the electronic universe with e-trash, including advertisements from commercial clients. To give everybody an idea of the scope of Soloway's activity, he allegedly sent out 90 million e-mails in a three-month period.
The made me wonder if anyone is looking at the commercial clients? Of course, everyone knows that "Spam Kings" send out a lot more than commercial advertisements, including a variety of scams designed to steal from unwary people. They also tout knock-off drugs, merchandise, software and porn.
Spam is also used to deliver malicious software, which can steal all your personal and financial information. Ironically, spam also delivers malware designed to turn a system (part of a botnet), which is then used to send out even more spam.
In fact, spam designed to send out even more spam best describes Soloway's operation. Using a company, Newport Internet Marketing Corporation (NIM), he offered a broadcast e-mail software product and broadcast e-mail services. His website promised a full refund if a customer wasn't satisfied, however in reality, if anyone ever complained they were threatened with financial charges and collection agencies.
According to the Department of Justice press release, one customer tried to complain about the amount of spam he was getting and Soloway's response was to send him even more spam.
The press release also mentions that he willfully failed to pay his taxes after earning more than $300,000 in 2005.
Interestingly, enough another "Spam King," Edward "Eddie" Davidson simply walked out of a minimum security facility in Colorado about the same time Soloway was sentenced. Davis allegedly made $3.5 million spamming for about 20 commercial clients. Like Soloway, he failed to pay any taxes on the proceeds of his misdeeds.
Unfortunately, Soloway's conviction or Davidson's escape is unlikely to make much of a dent in spam anytime in the near future. Earlier this month, Symantec reported blocking 3.5 million spam messages over the 4th of July holiday. Their monthly spam report reported that over 80 percent of all e-mail sent is spam. The 80 percent statistic (and greater) has been a sad fact for several months now.
Notable trends on the last report included using the China earthquake to spread viruses and the use of fake new flashes (like U.S.A. attacks Iran) to net Internet crime victims.
We probably shouldn't be too quick to celebrate Soloway's conviction. He is obviously just one of many "Spam Kings" operating out there. Hopefully, as time goes on, we will see more of these so-called spam superstars put behind bars. After all, just about anything that is distasteful or illegal on the Internet normally starts with a spam e-mail.
On a final note, both Soloway and Davidson seemed to be servicing a lot of commercial clients. Maybe if the legal emphasis shifted towards the people paying spammers, there would be less incentive (money) for spammers to pollute the Internet!
Update (7/25/08): In a horrifying twist to Eddie Davidson's escape, it has now been reported by the AFP that he killed himself after killing his wife and their three month old daughter. Davidson's seven month old son was left in the car unharmed and his sixteen year old daughter was shot in the neck before escaping.
Given these circumstances, I wonder if anyone is going to question why Davidson was locked up in a minumum security facility that he was able to walk away from?
For his misdeeds, Soloway was sentenced to just under four years. Notably, Soloway was the second person to be prosecuted under the Can-Spam Act. It should also be noted that the prosecutors asked for about twice the time in prison and with good behavior, Soloway will probably only serve about half of the sentence he received.
Like most of the many "Spam Kings" out there, Soloway allegedly used a botnet (army of zombie computers) to saturate the electronic universe with e-trash, including advertisements from commercial clients. To give everybody an idea of the scope of Soloway's activity, he allegedly sent out 90 million e-mails in a three-month period.
The made me wonder if anyone is looking at the commercial clients? Of course, everyone knows that "Spam Kings" send out a lot more than commercial advertisements, including a variety of scams designed to steal from unwary people. They also tout knock-off drugs, merchandise, software and porn.
Spam is also used to deliver malicious software, which can steal all your personal and financial information. Ironically, spam also delivers malware designed to turn a system (part of a botnet), which is then used to send out even more spam.
In fact, spam designed to send out even more spam best describes Soloway's operation. Using a company, Newport Internet Marketing Corporation (NIM), he offered a broadcast e-mail software product and broadcast e-mail services. His website promised a full refund if a customer wasn't satisfied, however in reality, if anyone ever complained they were threatened with financial charges and collection agencies.
According to the Department of Justice press release, one customer tried to complain about the amount of spam he was getting and Soloway's response was to send him even more spam.
The press release also mentions that he willfully failed to pay his taxes after earning more than $300,000 in 2005.
Interestingly, enough another "Spam King," Edward "Eddie" Davidson simply walked out of a minimum security facility in Colorado about the same time Soloway was sentenced. Davis allegedly made $3.5 million spamming for about 20 commercial clients. Like Soloway, he failed to pay any taxes on the proceeds of his misdeeds.
Unfortunately, Soloway's conviction or Davidson's escape is unlikely to make much of a dent in spam anytime in the near future. Earlier this month, Symantec reported blocking 3.5 million spam messages over the 4th of July holiday. Their monthly spam report reported that over 80 percent of all e-mail sent is spam. The 80 percent statistic (and greater) has been a sad fact for several months now.
Notable trends on the last report included using the China earthquake to spread viruses and the use of fake new flashes (like U.S.A. attacks Iran) to net Internet crime victims.
We probably shouldn't be too quick to celebrate Soloway's conviction. He is obviously just one of many "Spam Kings" operating out there. Hopefully, as time goes on, we will see more of these so-called spam superstars put behind bars. After all, just about anything that is distasteful or illegal on the Internet normally starts with a spam e-mail.
On a final note, both Soloway and Davidson seemed to be servicing a lot of commercial clients. Maybe if the legal emphasis shifted towards the people paying spammers, there would be less incentive (money) for spammers to pollute the Internet!
Update (7/25/08): In a horrifying twist to Eddie Davidson's escape, it has now been reported by the AFP that he killed himself after killing his wife and their three month old daughter. Davidson's seven month old son was left in the car unharmed and his sixteen year old daughter was shot in the neck before escaping.
Given these circumstances, I wonder if anyone is going to question why Davidson was locked up in a minumum security facility that he was able to walk away from?
Sunday, June 15, 2008
Send Dad a "Phishy" E-Card for Father's Day
In case you forgot to send a Father's Day card, here are some free ones courtesy of the fine folks at the Federal Trade Commission designed to educate him about phishing, which is a leading cause of identity theft on the Internet.
These were sent to me courtesy of Alvaro Puig from the Federal Trade Commission’s Division of Consumer and Business Education in Washington , D.C.
Please note that most of the consumer awareness materials from the FTC are available in both English and Espanol.
Avaro wrote:
With Father’s Day right around the corner, I wanted to let you know about our Father’s Day phishing e-card. This e-card, which is available at www.ftc.gov/dad (and www.ftc.gov/padre in Spanish) gives “Dear Old Dad” some useful tips on how to recognize and avoid phishing emails and protect his personal information. The e-card also links to our newly released “Phishy” videos that are designed to create awareness of phishing in a humorous way.
The FTC and their government agency partners provide a lot of free educational resources about fraud, phishing and financial misdeeds on the Internet at OnGuardOnline.gov. A lot of these presentations are visual and great tools to learn, or spread the word!
In the war against fraud, there is no more powerful tool than communication. The reason for this is that no matter how good a scam is -- human beings are less likely to fall for it if they are aware of the consequences.
More consumer awareness information can be obtained on the FTC's website and it is available in both English and Espanol.
Friday, June 06, 2008
Monthly Spam report reveals how uncertain economic times are fueling new scams!
(Courtesy of Symantec)
With prices rising out-of-control and foreclosure signs being used to market real estate, one might think that scam artists and other less than ethical people would lay off for awhile. Think again, they are out in force and coming up with devious methods to make bad situations, worse.
I follow Symantec's spam report on a monthly basis. If you want to get an idea of what fraud campaigns are being run by cyber criminals, or what new twists to old scams are surfacing - it's a great place to get an overview.
Interestingly enough, the report starts with a comparison of e-mail spam to the lunch meat it is named after:
The harsh economic times can be witnessed from every angle, with the rise not only in email spam, but also the sales of the actual lunchmeat product, Spam. According to NBC’s Brian Williams, the spike in Spam sales is a huge economic indicator of the times, and families trying to do more with less. The exact same could be said for email spam. With spam messages accounting for over 80% of email in May 2008, the economic slowdown and its effects are definitely being targeted by spammers – preying on the hardships of people not only in the United States, but Worldwide.
In the past month, the economic stimilus program and the disasters in China and Myanmar have clogged inboxes with come-ons designed to trick people out of their money, or even worse (if a little malware is dropped) all the personal and financial information off their computer.
The report also highlights a campaign in China, offering fake invoices to avoid paying taxes.
Also noted was a scam to sell tickets to the Championship League Final, which was the biggest football (soccer) event in recent times:
The biggest football game in the European football calendar took place on May 21, 2008 in Moscow. Tickets were in big demand all over Europe for this event, and spammers certainly took notice.Please note that ticket scams are nothing new and the more popular the event is, the more likely spammers (scammers) are going to try to dupe people out of their money in the hopes of securing a ticket.
Under the guise of a travel agency, the spammer offered the recipient “a unique opportunity” to acquire tickets for the game. The prospective customer was asked to click on a link to purchase the tickets and provide personal details. The recipient was then instructed to go to a legitimate online payment site to complete the transaction.
When the recipient paid for the tickets using the legitimate online payment site, the spammer requested that they email their name, surname and the unique online payment voucher number to the spammer in order to receive the tickets. The legitimate online payment website for the Champions League Final clearly states that the unique voucher number should never be emailed and only used on secure websites that accept their payments.
The June report highlights how spam has become a problem that has become International in nature!
Full June report from Symantec can be accessed, here.
Previous posts I've done on the monthly Spam Report can be seen, here.
Friday, December 14, 2007
Symantec reveals how the spammers are trying to steal Christmas
Kelly Conley announced the Christmas edition of Symantec's spam report on the company blog:
This month, three out of every four e-mails sent is spam!
Spammers are even using MP3s, videos, and Google's alerts/searches to spread their seedy marketing ventures to Internet users.
Here are some of the highlights of the end-of-year report:
The current interest in celebrities like Britney Spears, Lindsay Lohan and the Osmonds were used as lures to get people to open spam e-mails hawking "questionably safe" drugs.
Spammers use whatever is trendy, popular or in the news to trick people into clicking on them. Here is one of the sicker examples of this seen recently:
The report concludes it's findings with recognition of anti-spam efforts during the year, such as the FBI's Operation Bot Roast, the SEC's Operation Spamalot, ISP's sharing more information and security vendors employing new spam filter technologies.
We need to remember that spam is the vehicle used to spread 99.9 percent of the questionable marketing and scams on the Internet. Clicking on a spam e-mail can cause a person to become victim of anything from a financial scam to using a unsafe product that is a threat to their personal safety.
These reports serve a purpose, which is to educate the average person on what to watch out for and not click on a spam e-mail in the first place. Since it's Christmas and a lot of us are thinking about the young people in our lives, perhaps this is a good time to educate them on the growing problem of spam on the Internet!
I meet a few older people from time to time that might benefit from the education process, also.
Kelley Conley's blog post announcing the December report, here.
Symantec's December (year end) report on the state of spam, here.
On a lighter note, here is the YouTube video on the 12 days of Christmas Spam:
Here we are the end of another year. As 2007 rolls to a close the December State of Spam Report reviews this past month’s key trends and reflects on some of the year’s most notable spam events and trends.The report notes that Bill Gates' prediction in 2004 that spam would be eradicated has proven not only to be wrong, but that the amount of spam circulating on the Internet has exceeded everyone's expectations (nightmares?).
This month, three out of every four e-mails sent is spam!
Spammers are even using MP3s, videos, and Google's alerts/searches to spread their seedy marketing ventures to Internet users.
Here are some of the highlights of the end-of-year report:
• Penny stocks use Thanksgiving holiday captions in subject line – spammers using common personal Thanksgiving-related words in the subject of emails
• Replica products a favorite for spammers this holiday season – replica gear has always been a spammer favorite. Spammers are marketing their wares using seasonal words in the subject lines of their mailings
• Spam begins to snowball – spammers collecting email addresses by using a funny .gif that shows a snowball hurtling at you through your computer
• Christmas freebie anyone? – spammers taking advantage of the season to market "free" gift cards for well known companies
• Seasonal lotto scams - in a scam targeted at UK end users, spammers have updated a lottery spam email for a Christmas Bonanza special
The current interest in celebrities like Britney Spears, Lindsay Lohan and the Osmonds were used as lures to get people to open spam e-mails hawking "questionably safe" drugs.
Spammers use whatever is trendy, popular or in the news to trick people into clicking on them. Here is one of the sicker examples of this seen recently:
An attack this month preyed on the public interest in the story of the missing British child, Madeleine McCann. The email contained a link to http://madeleine2007.notlong.com/, which redirected to http://internetwonderful.com/madeleine. The second site is designed to look similar to the official McCann family site, www.findmadeleine.com, however, it actually is set up to distribute a virus. The site also contains an unauthorized use of the Symantec logo and a number of Google ads for anti-virus products.
It should be noted that although the spam email also contains a link to the legitimate findmadeliene.com site, there is no connection between the spammers and the genuine site.
The report concludes it's findings with recognition of anti-spam efforts during the year, such as the FBI's Operation Bot Roast, the SEC's Operation Spamalot, ISP's sharing more information and security vendors employing new spam filter technologies.
We need to remember that spam is the vehicle used to spread 99.9 percent of the questionable marketing and scams on the Internet. Clicking on a spam e-mail can cause a person to become victim of anything from a financial scam to using a unsafe product that is a threat to their personal safety.
These reports serve a purpose, which is to educate the average person on what to watch out for and not click on a spam e-mail in the first place. Since it's Christmas and a lot of us are thinking about the young people in our lives, perhaps this is a good time to educate them on the growing problem of spam on the Internet!
I meet a few older people from time to time that might benefit from the education process, also.
Kelley Conley's blog post announcing the December report, here.
Symantec's December (year end) report on the state of spam, here.
On a lighter note, here is the YouTube video on the 12 days of Christmas Spam:
Thursday, November 22, 2007
Symantec predicts a flood of spam this holiday season!
dejaking posted this picture of the 2005 Symantec Christmas Party on Flickr. I wonder if they will be singing the "12 days of Christmas Spam" at this year's party. The words for this song (written by some creative Symantec types) are at the bottom of this post!
With Black Friday upon us and Cyber Monday a few days away, spammers are preparing to flood the Internet with their attempts to commit fraud, phishing and financial misdeeds.
There is no doubt that spam is the vehicle used to spread 99 percent of the scams on the Internet. From misleading advertising to outright criminal schemes, spam has become a potential threat to anyone who uses the Internet.
Just clicking on a spam link can download malicious software on your system, which can steal all your personal and financial details.
According to the National Retail Federation 39 percent of us are going to do some shopping on line. If gas prices continue to go up, we might see this number go up (my prediction).
If this occurs, this could be extremely lucrative for e-commerce merchants. Online sales are already predicted to be $26 billion this season -- up $5 billion from last year's figure of 21 billion, according to the Conference Board.
Spam is a big business that has a negative impact on the economy. The estimate of how much negative impact spam causes has reached $100 billion a year, worldwide. $35 billion of this is in the United States, according to Ferris Research.
According to Symantec -- a leading computer security company, who monitors 450 million inboxes for spam -- 71 percent of e-mail sent out is spam.
This is up from 59 percent of the e-mail sent out a year ago.
Symantec is also predicting the top lures spammers will be using to trap people in their web-of-deceit:
1. LaptopsHere are Symantec's recommended Best Practices to Can Holiday Spam:
2. Replica watches (historically the most popular online
holiday buy according to NRF)
3. Business cards (even Santa doesn’t leave home without them, at least that’s the case in the spam sample going around)
4. Male enhancement drugs (always a popular sale during the holidays)
5. MP3 Players
6. Discount software (who wants to pay hundreds of
dollars for that new Office suite for your new PC, when you can get it for $25?)
7. Free cellphones
8. Handheld video games
9. Weight loss solutions (playing right into the pending New Year’s resolutions of shedding those added holiday pounds)
10. Gift cards (from every imaginable large retailer and up to $500)
1. Protect your desktop with an up-to-date antivirus, firewall, and spam filter.
2. Do not click on, or reply to, any email that appears to be spam. Doing so could alert the spammer(s) that the user is replying from a legitimate email address (therefore, the spammer would find it worth the time to send more spam in the direction of that Inbox).
3. Never click on any link in a suspicious email. If it is felt that the sender is legitimate, contact the sender directly (not by email) to ensure the email message is also legitimate.
I would also add to make sure you only shop on legitimate websites that can be verified. One way to verify if a site is legitimate is to use TrustWatch. The site uses a color-coded system, which shows whether or not a site has been verified.
There are a lot of fake websites out there, which often appear to be real. While there is no way to be 100 percent sure because sites are sometimes hacked, it pays to be cautious.
Get Safe Online has a page on their site, which gives more detail on how to spot fake websites, here.
To end on a lighter note, the folks at Symantec seem to have changed the words to the 12 days of Christmas:
12 Days of Christmas Spam
On the first day of Christmas,
a spammer offered me
A brand new shiny PC
On the second day of Christmas,
a spammer offered me
A Rolex watch,
And a brand new shiny PC
On the third day of Christmas,
a spammer offered me
Cheesy business cards,
A Rolex watch,
And a brand new shiny PC
On the fourth day of Christmas,
a spammer offered me
H – D - TV,
Cheesy business cards,
A Rolex watch,
And a brand new shiny PC
On the fifth day of Christmas,
a spammer offered me
Vi – A – Grrrr -Ra,
H – D - TV,
Cheesy business cards,
A Rolex watch,
And a brand new shiny PC
On the sixth day of Christmas,
a spammer offered me
A pink iPod Nano,
Vi – A – Grrrr -Ra,
H – D - TV,
Cheesy business cards,
A Rolex watch,
And a brand new shiny PC
On the seventh day of Christmas,
a spammer offered me
Super chee – eap software,
A pink iPod Nano,
Vi – A – Grrrr -Ra,
H – D - TV,
Cheesy business cards,
A Rolex watch,
And a brand new shiny PC
On the eighth day of Christmas,
a spammer offered me,
A blue Razr cellphone,
Super chee - eap software
A pink iPod Nano,
Vi – A – Grrrr -Ra,
H – D - TV,
Cheesy business cards,
A Rolex watch,
And a brand new shiny PC
On the ninth day of Christmas,
a spammer offered me
Nintendo D – ee - Ses,
A blue Razr cellphone,
Super chee - eap software,
A pink iPod Nano,
Vi – A – Grrrr -Ra,
H – D - TV,
Cheesy business cards,
A Rolex watch,
And a brand new shiny PC
On the tenth day of Christmas,
a spammer offered me
A Canon camera
Nintendo D – ee - Ses,
A blue Razr cellphone,
Super chee - eap software,
A pink iPod Nano,
Vi – A – Grrrr -Ra,
H – D - TV,
Cheesy business cards,
A Rolex watch,
And a brand new shiny PC
On the eleventh day of Christmas,
a spammer offered me
The perfect weight loss drug,
A Canon camera,
Nintendo D – ee - Ses,
A blue Razr cellphone,
Super chee - eap software,
A pink iPod Nano,
Vi – A – Grrrr -Ra,
H – D - TV,
Cheesy business cards,
A Rolex watch,
And a brand new shiny PC
On the twelfth day of Christmas,
a spammer offered me
$500 gift cards
The perfect weight loss drug,
A Canon camera,
Nintendo D – ee - Ses,
A blue Razr cellphone,
Super chee - eap software,
A pink iPod Nano,
Vi – A – Grrrr -Ra,
H – D - TV,
Cheesy business cards,
A Rolex watch,
And a brand new shiny PC
Sunday, August 26, 2007
Apophis - a malware tool that is smart and can steal 30,000 people's personal details
If anyone thinks our personal information is safe, think again. Panda Labs, an International security software company, recently discovered a tool, which appears to be stealing personal and financial details on a global basis.
From Panda's press release:
Besides that, stolen identities are used by illegal immigrants, criminals and some claim, terrorists to blend into society.
Even worse, this tool is considered smart -- it actively searches out the information criminals desire.
According to Panda, this tool can store over 30,000 records. That is a lot of people that can be victimized by just one of these nasty devices.
More information, including some screen shots from the Panda blog, here.
The press release can be viewed, here.
Panda also offers a free scan to see if your computer might be infected, here.
From Panda's press release:
A version of Apophis, a tool used by cyber-crooks to handle information stolen from users infected by several variants of the Nuklus family of Trojans, stores data belonging to over 30,000 users from more than twenty countries. PandaLabs has been able to access a file with some of the stolen data. This file kept encrypted confidential data belonging to almost 1,500 people from the USA, Canada and the UK.In more simple terms, this gives criminals the ability to clean out your financial resources, then use your information to get more credit, which you will be hounded for when the bills aren't paid.
Surprisingly enough, this data contained, in addition to information about bank and email accounts, information such as the users’ postal address, phone number or their credit card expiry date. With this information, cyber-crooks not only can get the users’ money, but also impersonate them and use their identity to make purchases, bank transfers, etc., in their name.
Besides that, stolen identities are used by illegal immigrants, criminals and some claim, terrorists to blend into society.
Even worse, this tool is considered smart -- it actively searches out the information criminals desire.
According to Panda, this tool can store over 30,000 records. That is a lot of people that can be victimized by just one of these nasty devices.
More information, including some screen shots from the Panda blog, here.
The press release can be viewed, here.
Panda also offers a free scan to see if your computer might be infected, here.
Friday, August 24, 2007
Internet criminals stealing information from job sites isn't anything new!
The recent reports about 1.3 million Monster users having their information stolen from the job site has become somewhat of a major news story. While this seems shocking, the truth is that job sites have been targeted for the information they contain, or to recruit people to commit crimes (sometimes unknowingly) for quite awhile now.
Jim Finkle at Retuers (courtesy of the Washington Post) recently covered this story:
People can protect themselves by being aware of the social engineering aspects of these scams. The job offers are always too good to be true and normally don't make very much sense.
Most of them are ploys to either cash bogus financial instruments, or launder the proceeds of Internet crime. Another red flag is that the employee is solicited to wire money, normally across a International border.
The employee (victim) then ends up financially liable, and in some instances, can even end up facing criminal charges. In most areas, cashing bogus financial instruments and money laundering is considered a crime.
The scammers, who offer these jobs intend to get someone else to take all the risk for them, while they reap most of the financial rewards.
Monster isn't the only place, where this happens. The risk is there on just about any of the Internet job sites, including Craigslist.
If you use these sites, it's a good idea to verify, who you are talking to before accepting a job offer.
The Privacy Rights Clearinghouse has an excellent page about job scams on their website, here.
Because these fake employers gather their victims's personal and financial information, they are likely to become an identity theft victim, also.
The page on the Privacy Right Clearinghouse site gives good advice on how to deal with this, also.
The good news is these scams are pretty easy to spot and a little awareness can prevent them from happening altogether.
Reuters story (courtesy of the Washington Post), here.
Jim Finkle at Retuers (courtesy of the Washington Post) recently covered this story:
Monster.com waited five days to tell its users about a security breach that resulted in the theft of confidential information from some 1.3 million job seekers, a company executive told Reuters on Thursday.Symantec -- who broke the story has published some of the examples of the fake job offers being sent to people -- posting their resumes on Monster, here.
Hackers broke into the U.S. online recruitment site's password-protected resume library using credentials that Monster Worldwide Inc said were stolen from its clients, in one of the biggest Internet security breaches in recent memory.
They launched the attack using two servers at a Web-hosting company in Ukraine and a group of personal computers that the hackers controlled after infecting them with a malicious software program known as Infostealer.Monstres, said Patrick Manzo, vice president of compliance and fraud prevention for Monster, in a phone interview.
People can protect themselves by being aware of the social engineering aspects of these scams. The job offers are always too good to be true and normally don't make very much sense.
Most of them are ploys to either cash bogus financial instruments, or launder the proceeds of Internet crime. Another red flag is that the employee is solicited to wire money, normally across a International border.
The employee (victim) then ends up financially liable, and in some instances, can even end up facing criminal charges. In most areas, cashing bogus financial instruments and money laundering is considered a crime.
The scammers, who offer these jobs intend to get someone else to take all the risk for them, while they reap most of the financial rewards.
Monster isn't the only place, where this happens. The risk is there on just about any of the Internet job sites, including Craigslist.
If you use these sites, it's a good idea to verify, who you are talking to before accepting a job offer.
The Privacy Rights Clearinghouse has an excellent page about job scams on their website, here.
Because these fake employers gather their victims's personal and financial information, they are likely to become an identity theft victim, also.
The page on the Privacy Right Clearinghouse site gives good advice on how to deal with this, also.
The good news is these scams are pretty easy to spot and a little awareness can prevent them from happening altogether.
Reuters story (courtesy of the Washington Post), here.
Sunday, July 29, 2007
The Coalition Against Domain Name Abuse seeks to disable Cybersquatting
Cybersquatting is where people, who may have less than honorable intentions, set up a website with a domain name that appears to be a trusted brand, or organization.
Often, these domains are then used to commit financial crimes on the Internet.
In most of the recent disasters, most notably the Katrina hurricane, some of these look alike domain names were sold for a lot of money.
Sadly, these look-alike domain names, which victimize people and businesses, are being sold legally.
These look alike domain names are used in phishing scams, also. If you ever want to see a lot of fake websites, that appear to be real, visit Artists Against 419 and go to their Lad Vampire page.
Dibya Sarkar of the Washington Post is reporting about a coalition lobbying Congress to stop making this activity (like most crime on the Internet) too easy to accomplish:
Washington Post story, here.
The coalition has set up a website, that anyone can join:
The Coalition Against Domain Name Abuse
The Post article failed to mention all the businesses backing the coalition. The entire list is located, here.
Often, these domains are then used to commit financial crimes on the Internet.
In most of the recent disasters, most notably the Katrina hurricane, some of these look alike domain names were sold for a lot of money.
Sadly, these look-alike domain names, which victimize people and businesses, are being sold legally.
These look alike domain names are used in phishing scams, also. If you ever want to see a lot of fake websites, that appear to be real, visit Artists Against 419 and go to their Lad Vampire page.
Dibya Sarkar of the Washington Post is reporting about a coalition lobbying Congress to stop making this activity (like most crime on the Internet) too easy to accomplish:
Well-known companies such as Dell Inc., Yahoo Inc. and Marriott International Inc. are lobbying Congress for tougher laws targeting online scammers who profit from their brand names.
United as the Coalition Against Domain Name Abuse, 10 companies have hired the law firm Alston and Bird LLP to persuade federal lawmakers of the need to crack down against those who claim Web addresses, or domain names, that include _ or even resemble _ a legitimate company's trademark.
Washington Post story, here.
The coalition has set up a website, that anyone can join:
The Coalition Against Domain Name Abuse
The Post article failed to mention all the businesses backing the coalition. The entire list is located, here.
Saturday, June 09, 2007
The Virginia Watchdog - one woman making a difference in the war against Identity Theft
*Cartoon courtesy of the Virginia Watchdog site.BJ (Betty) Ostergren a.k.a. “the Virginia Watchdog” is ONE woman making a difference on a daily basis. The way she makes a difference is by stopping our personal information from being plastered all over the Internet by local governments.
Most of these records have been sitting in different county offices for a long time, however in the past ten years; many of them have gone online.
These records contain everything a criminal would need to commit identity-theft -- or even scarier -- everything a more twisted person would need to track someone down with a more sinister intent than stealing money.
Since children’s information is on these sites, this information could even be used by pedophiles.
The reason this information has been placed online is because special interests have been pressuring legislators to make it easier for them to data-mine information. Data brokers have a vested interest in having this information VERY easy to get at.
They are making billions of dollars selling people’s personal information.
Data brokers sell this information to just about anyone -- as evidenced in a recent New York Times story -- where one of these brokers, InfoUSA, sold lists of information used by Internet scam artists to target senior citizens.
Smart Money did a story on BJ, which shows how this information is being made available, worldwide. Smart Money correspondent Aleksandra Todorova quoted David Bloys, a title examiner as saying:
Once a county's records are digitized, it's very easy — and incredibly cheap — for data compilers like Axciom and DataTrade to purchase the files and sell them to information brokers like Choicepoint, says Bloys. That's because under most states' Open Records laws, counties cannot charge more than the cost of copying the documents — which means a computer disk containing 10,000 records can be hadfor as little as a few dollars. What's more, Bloys explains, the companies that actually scan the documents for the county — the so-called wholesalers — often ship the images to foreign countries, like India or China, where outsourcers index the records much more cheaply than could be done in the United States. "[Our public information] is being distributed instantly all over the world," says Bloys.
The Smart Money article also pointed out a site, which proves this point:
To see for yourself, take a look at the web site of String Information Services, an outsourcing data digitalization and processing company in India, which boasts of its ability to provide you or your business with "online access to [lien and judgment] records of more than 200 counties."
BJ was kind enough to spend a little time with me and demonstrate exactly what she is talking about. We got on the Internet together, and she was able to find a lot of personal information on people I know in the greater Washington D.C. area (Maryland Suburbs).
BJ has been able to access a lot of people’s personal information on these sites. Some of the people's information she has found include politicians, crime fighters and celebrities. Personal information on Wolf Blitzer, Donald Trump, Rudy Giuliani, Jeb Bush, Colin Powell, Leonardo DiCaprio and Robert De Niro - to name a few - have all been found online by BJ.
There is little doubt all of us are at risk when personal and private information is available to anyone, but some are at more risk, than others.
BJ was quoted in the Washington Post as saying something, which should scare all of us:
Don't you think if I can get Tom DeLay's Social Security number . . . that some guy in an Internet cafe in Pakistan can, too?" she asks, her voice rising with indignation. "It's just ridiculous what we're doing in this country."
This struck me as particularly chilling, in the post 9-11 world. Think about what a terrorist, or other fiend could do with some of this information, which can be accessed by anyone!
To me, BJ is a real American hero and deserves of all of our support. She is not compensated in any manner for what she is doing, and has spent a lot of her own money on this NOBLE effort. She also spends a lot of her PERSONAL TIME letting people know they are exposed.
Although, this story is being covered in a lot of places -- including this humble blog -- there are some, who think she should be featured on a big show like Oprah.
Bill O’Reilly lobbied long and hard to get on Oprah, and she finally put him on. This is an important story, perhaps Bill should consider doing a segment on the Virginia Watchdog, also.
Recently, Oprah did a show about Internet fraud, after her name was being used in some Internet scams. There is little doubt that the Internet has enabled a lot of fraud, making it too easy to do with the click of a mouse from just about anywhere.
You can write Oprah to ask her to put BJ on her show, here.
BJ's site, which has a ongoing chronology of her efforts, can be seen, here.
The Smart Money article, I quoted can be viewed, here.
Wednesday, April 04, 2007
Google name used in Internet deployed Lottery Scam
If it's too good to be true, it probably isn't (especially on the Internet). A spam e-mail, I received today informed me that I've won Google's lottery and 500,000 euros.
Trusted names are used to provide a false sense of legitimacy. Since I myself am a Google fan (user), I decided to comment on this one.
When the (eventually unfortunate) winner answers one of these, they are asked to send (wire transfer is preferred) money to cover taxes and tariffs to get their prize released.
Frequently, the scammer will send a counterfeit check (normally official, or cashier type) for their intended victim (winner) to cash. Eventually, the counterfeit check is discovered and the lottery winner is left hold the bag. Besides, financial consequences, (if I am to believe people reading this blog), cashing these items can cause someone to get arrested, also.
Unfortunately, the crooks behind these scams are normally safe in another country and rarely (if ever) get caught.
For a more detailed explanation on how these scams work (the lottery variety is one mutation of them), I did a post:
Counterfeit Cashier's Checks Fuel Internet Crime
A lot of the spam deploying these scams is facilitated using botnets (groups of zombie computers) that were taken over after another unfortunate Internet user opened an attachment in a spam e-mail, they probably shouldn't have.
Here is a post, I did at the beginning of the year describing this problem (getting worse all the time):
2006 was the Year of Internet Crime - 2007 is predicted to be even worse
Here is the e-mail I received (complete with all the bad grammar and spelling mistakes). Bad grammar and spelling mistakes are common in these e-mail lures.
Another clue is always the instruction not to tell anyone they are a winner.
From:nelson@nelsonbeilean.orangehome.co.uk
Subject:ISP Nomination/Email Award.
Date:Wed, 4 Apr 2007 17:53:07 +0200 (CEST)
To:FROM: LOTTERY COORDINATOR,INT. PROMOTIONS AND PRICE AWARD DEPARTMENTGOOGLE. Bolos Avenue 12900 kd .RESULTS FOR CATEGORY "A" DRAWS
Congratulations to you as we bring to your notice, the results of the First Category draws of E-MAIL LOTTERY organised by GOOGLE INT. We are happy to inform you that you have emerged a winner under the First Category, which is part of our promotional draws. The draws were held on 30th of March 2007 and results are being officially announced today 4th of April 2007. Participants were selected through a computer ballot system drawn from 5,500,000 email addresses of individuals and companies from Africa, America, Asia, Australia, Europe, Middle East, and Oceania as part of our International Promotions Program. Your e-mail address, attached to ticket number 675432890044/376, with serial number 2200-33 drew the lucky numbers 1-0-11-44-03-22 and consequently won in the First Category. You have therefore been awarded a lump sum pay out of One million (1,000,000.00) euros, which is the winning payout for Category A winners. This is from the total prize money from 1,500,000 euros shared among the 2 winners in this category. Your fund is now deposited with the paying Bank. In your best interest to avoid mix up of numbers and names of any kind, we request that you keep the entire details of your award strictly from public notice until the process of transferring your claims has been completed, and your funds remitted to your account. This is part of our security protocol to avoid double claiming or unscrupulous acts by participants / non participants of this program. Please contact your claims agent immediately for due processing and remittance of your prize money to a designated account of your choice:To file for your claim, please contact the CLAIMS agent.
Mr.Windy Smith.Cable Trust AgencyEmail: *(e-mail
addresses and telephone numbers removed) Academias53,11269 Athens
Greece.
You are advised to contact the agents by Email address.
NOTE: For easy reference and identification, find below your reference and Batch numbers.
Remember to quote these numbers in every one of your
correspondence with your claims agent.
REFERENCE NO:GPINT/7980/4376/06 BATCH
NO: 33/904/G3K. Congratulations once again from all our staff and thank you for
being part of our promotions program.
Sincerely Yours,
Dr.
Nelson Beilean.
PROMOTIONS COORDINATOR.
Trusted names are used to provide a false sense of legitimacy. Since I myself am a Google fan (user), I decided to comment on this one.
When the (eventually unfortunate) winner answers one of these, they are asked to send (wire transfer is preferred) money to cover taxes and tariffs to get their prize released.
Frequently, the scammer will send a counterfeit check (normally official, or cashier type) for their intended victim (winner) to cash. Eventually, the counterfeit check is discovered and the lottery winner is left hold the bag. Besides, financial consequences, (if I am to believe people reading this blog), cashing these items can cause someone to get arrested, also.
Unfortunately, the crooks behind these scams are normally safe in another country and rarely (if ever) get caught.
For a more detailed explanation on how these scams work (the lottery variety is one mutation of them), I did a post:
Counterfeit Cashier's Checks Fuel Internet Crime
A lot of the spam deploying these scams is facilitated using botnets (groups of zombie computers) that were taken over after another unfortunate Internet user opened an attachment in a spam e-mail, they probably shouldn't have.
Here is a post, I did at the beginning of the year describing this problem (getting worse all the time):
2006 was the Year of Internet Crime - 2007 is predicted to be even worse
Here is the e-mail I received (complete with all the bad grammar and spelling mistakes). Bad grammar and spelling mistakes are common in these e-mail lures.
Another clue is always the instruction not to tell anyone they are a winner.
From:nelson@nelsonbeilean.orangehome.co.uk
Subject:ISP Nomination/Email Award.
Date:Wed, 4 Apr 2007 17:53:07 +0200 (CEST)
To:FROM: LOTTERY COORDINATOR,INT. PROMOTIONS AND PRICE AWARD DEPARTMENTGOOGLE. Bolos Avenue 12900 kd .RESULTS FOR CATEGORY "A" DRAWS
Congratulations to you as we bring to your notice, the results of the First Category draws of E-MAIL LOTTERY organised by GOOGLE INT. We are happy to inform you that you have emerged a winner under the First Category, which is part of our promotional draws. The draws were held on 30th of March 2007 and results are being officially announced today 4th of April 2007. Participants were selected through a computer ballot system drawn from 5,500,000 email addresses of individuals and companies from Africa, America, Asia, Australia, Europe, Middle East, and Oceania as part of our International Promotions Program. Your e-mail address, attached to ticket number 675432890044/376, with serial number 2200-33 drew the lucky numbers 1-0-11-44-03-22 and consequently won in the First Category. You have therefore been awarded a lump sum pay out of One million (1,000,000.00) euros, which is the winning payout for Category A winners. This is from the total prize money from 1,500,000 euros shared among the 2 winners in this category. Your fund is now deposited with the paying Bank. In your best interest to avoid mix up of numbers and names of any kind, we request that you keep the entire details of your award strictly from public notice until the process of transferring your claims has been completed, and your funds remitted to your account. This is part of our security protocol to avoid double claiming or unscrupulous acts by participants / non participants of this program. Please contact your claims agent immediately for due processing and remittance of your prize money to a designated account of your choice:To file for your claim, please contact the CLAIMS agent.
Mr.Windy Smith.Cable Trust AgencyEmail: *(e-mail
addresses and telephone numbers removed) Academias53,11269 Athens
Greece.
You are advised to contact the agents by Email address.
NOTE: For easy reference and identification, find below your reference and Batch numbers.
Remember to quote these numbers in every one of your
correspondence with your claims agent.
REFERENCE NO:GPINT/7980/4376/06 BATCH
NO: 33/904/G3K. Congratulations once again from all our staff and thank you for
being part of our promotions program.
Sincerely Yours,
Dr.
Nelson Beilean.
PROMOTIONS COORDINATOR.
Saturday, March 17, 2007
Auction Fraud Tops FBI's 2006 Internet Crime Report
The FBI's Internet Crime Report for 2006 has been released. It shows that 45 percent of the complaints are for auction fraud and that "old standards" like the Nigerian letter still hook victims.
In fact, according to the report, the Nigerian Letter accounted for the highest median loss ($5,100).
Other Internet crimes covered in the report are identity theft, investment fraud, cyberstalking, phishing, spoofing and spamming.
The report indicates more crimes were reported to the FBI in 2006 than in any other previous year.
While we might like to believe that Internet crime comes from afar, the report shows 61 percent of Internet fraudsters come from the United States. Other countries of origin listed were the U.K., Nigeria, Canada, Romania, and Italy.
74 percent of the victims were contacted via e-mail.
Full report, here.
The report has tips on how to avoid becoming a victim.
More tips can be viewed on the IC3 site, here.
In fact, according to the report, the Nigerian Letter accounted for the highest median loss ($5,100).
Other Internet crimes covered in the report are identity theft, investment fraud, cyberstalking, phishing, spoofing and spamming.
The report indicates more crimes were reported to the FBI in 2006 than in any other previous year.
While we might like to believe that Internet crime comes from afar, the report shows 61 percent of Internet fraudsters come from the United States. Other countries of origin listed were the U.K., Nigeria, Canada, Romania, and Italy.
74 percent of the victims were contacted via e-mail.
Full report, here.
The report has tips on how to avoid becoming a victim.
More tips can be viewed on the IC3 site, here.
Sunday, February 18, 2007
Buying drugs on the Internet could be hazardous to your health
I normally write about Internet fraud, which is enabled (a lot) by spam e-mails attacking our in-boxes on a daily basis.
A lot of these spam e-mails are trying to sell drugs.
The FDA is now warning all of us that buying these drugs from questionable sources could be hazardous to your health.
This makes this issue more serious than losing a little money!
From their press release on the matter:
My advice is to anyone, who cares to listen, is get your prescriptions from your own doctor and fill them at your local pharmacy.
The FDA has a lot more material on how to avoid problems, such as this one, on their main website, here.
A lot of these spam e-mails are trying to sell drugs.
The FDA is now warning all of us that buying these drugs from questionable sources could be hazardous to your health.
This makes this issue more serious than losing a little money!
From their press release on the matter:
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has become aware that a number of Americans who placed orders for specific drug products over the Internet (Ambien, Xanax, Lexapro, and Ativan), instead received a product that, according to preliminary analysis, contains haloperidol, a powerful anti-psychotic drug.FDA press release, here.
Reports show several consumers in the United States have sought emergency medical treatment for symptoms such as difficulty in breathing, muscle spasms and muscle stiffness after ingesting the suspect product. Haloperidol can cause muscle stiffness and spasms, agitation, and sedation.
Therefore, the agency is reissuing its warning to consumers about the possible dangers of buying prescription drugs online. FDA urges consumers to review the FDA Web site for information before buying medication over the Internet.
My advice is to anyone, who cares to listen, is get your prescriptions from your own doctor and fill them at your local pharmacy.
The FDA has a lot more material on how to avoid problems, such as this one, on their main website, here.
Thursday, February 15, 2007
Is Julie Amero (in reality) another victim of Internet crime?
Internet crime is a growing problem. Every week, we seem to read of large scale data breaches, and spam is filling up our inboxes, despite the spam filters designed to stop it.
The spam getting past these filters is often riddled with deceptive lures (links) to all sorts of porn sites. In turn, these sites often infect machines that aren't properly protected with adware, spyware, malware and even crimeware.
So far as properly protecting our machines, this can be a chore, also. It requires frequent updates, and new exploits are discovered all the time.
Sometimes even legitimate sites are hacked and people get infected just by surfing, or visiting (what they think) is a trusted site.
Criminals of all sorts, including those of an organized nature are getting involved in Internet crime. In fact, many believe the problem is growing because very few get caught, and even if they do, very little happens to them.
I was amazed when I got an e-mail from Alex Eckelberry (CEO Sunbelt Software) that a substitute teacher (Julie Amero) had been convicted for some porn that had shown up on a classroom computer.
A jury has already found her guilty and she could face up to 40 years in prison. Even worse, it appears the stress of the trial may have caused her to have a miscarriage.
Is her conviction a miscarriage of justice? Many computer experts (including Alex) seem to think so.
Alex writes a very convincing argument, where he states:
An article from the Norwich Bulletin stated that:
She was also convicted on testimony that she must have had to physically click on the sites in question. According to Alex and other computer security experts, the pop-ups from these sites leave the same imprint as if they had been physically clicked on.
Alex wrote in the Norwich Bulletin:
Alex also states that this was an old system, without adequate protection, despite the fact that federal law mandates that it should have been in place.
Julie, herself claims the website in question was accessed by students when she went to the restroom. When she noticed it, no matter what she did, more pop-ups would surface.
More on Herb Horner's analysis (courtesy of the Sunbelt blog), here.
In a criminal case, the standard is that a person should be found innocent if there is reasonable doubt. After reading about this case, it makes sense to me, that we have a lot of reasonable doubt that Julie is guilty.
At best, the investigation used to convict her seems to have been poorly researched, and therefore, flawed.
Porn is a big component of Internet crime, which according to a WebMD survey reaches a lot of children. This research was conducted by interviewing children, themselves.
Some of the children interviewed were the same age as the ones in Julie's class that day.
Survey, here.
So far as a connection to real (organized) crime, porn was allegedly one of the Gambino crime families biggest earners ($350 million).
Besides being unjust, going after Julie Amero, is a big waste of resources (taxpayer dollars) that could be put to better use.
The spam getting past these filters is often riddled with deceptive lures (links) to all sorts of porn sites. In turn, these sites often infect machines that aren't properly protected with adware, spyware, malware and even crimeware.
So far as properly protecting our machines, this can be a chore, also. It requires frequent updates, and new exploits are discovered all the time.
Sometimes even legitimate sites are hacked and people get infected just by surfing, or visiting (what they think) is a trusted site.
Criminals of all sorts, including those of an organized nature are getting involved in Internet crime. In fact, many believe the problem is growing because very few get caught, and even if they do, very little happens to them.
I was amazed when I got an e-mail from Alex Eckelberry (CEO Sunbelt Software) that a substitute teacher (Julie Amero) had been convicted for some porn that had shown up on a classroom computer.
A jury has already found her guilty and she could face up to 40 years in prison. Even worse, it appears the stress of the trial may have caused her to have a miscarriage.
Is her conviction a miscarriage of justice? Many computer experts (including Alex) seem to think so.
Alex writes a very convincing argument, where he states:
When I first read of the case, my reaction was how illogical it all sounded: A middle-aged, substitute female teacher accessing porn on a classroom computer, in front of her students on one particular day? It made no sense.He's right, it doesn't make sense.
An article from the Norwich Bulletin stated that:
Computer expert W. Herbert Horner, testifying in Amero's defense, said he found spyware on the computer and an innocent hair styling Web site "that led to this pornographic loop that was out of control."
"If you try to get out of it, you're trapped, according to Horner."Anyone, who has surfed the Internet knows there are a lot of malicious sites designed to lure people to click on them, using seemingly innocent lures.
She was also convicted on testimony that she must have had to physically click on the sites in question. According to Alex and other computer security experts, the pop-ups from these sites leave the same imprint as if they had been physically clicked on.
Alex wrote in the Norwich Bulletin:
The computer was also found to be riddled with spyware -- programs that generate popups and degrade system stability.
Spyware may or may not have played a direct part in this incident, but the fact it was on the system creates additional damning evidence of the state of this computer system. What is extraordinary is the prosecution admitted there was no search made for spyware -- an incredible blunder akin to not checking for fingerprints at a crime scene.
Alex also states that this was an old system, without adequate protection, despite the fact that federal law mandates that it should have been in place.
Julie, herself claims the website in question was accessed by students when she went to the restroom. When she noticed it, no matter what she did, more pop-ups would surface.
More on Herb Horner's analysis (courtesy of the Sunbelt blog), here.
In a criminal case, the standard is that a person should be found innocent if there is reasonable doubt. After reading about this case, it makes sense to me, that we have a lot of reasonable doubt that Julie is guilty.
At best, the investigation used to convict her seems to have been poorly researched, and therefore, flawed.
Porn is a big component of Internet crime, which according to a WebMD survey reaches a lot of children. This research was conducted by interviewing children, themselves.
Some of the children interviewed were the same age as the ones in Julie's class that day.
Survey, here.
So far as a connection to real (organized) crime, porn was allegedly one of the Gambino crime families biggest earners ($350 million).
Besides being unjust, going after Julie Amero, is a big waste of resources (taxpayer dollars) that could be put to better use.
Thursday, January 11, 2007
New phishing rod being marketed on Internet crime forums
A new and more dangerous "phishing rod" is being marketed and sold in Internet crime forums. This assures that this "phishing rod" will be readily available to all sorts of "i-jackers" (identity theives).
DigitalTransactionNews is reporting:
DigitalTransactionNews article, here.
I first read about the man in the middle phishing attack when it was discovered at CastleCops by PIRT (Phishing Incident Reporting and Termination Squad) and reported by Internet crime writer Brian Krebs of the Washington Post, here.
PIRT is a great place to report suspected phish. They have a lot of dedicated personnel that fight phishing!
It's a shame that these Internet crime forums are allowed to continue operating. It's even been reported that one of them is being "hosted" in the Islamic Republic of Iran.
And Internet crime isn't the only problem that Iran is hosting. I'm sure some of our brave troops in Iraq and Afghanistan could attest to that.
Until we go after the sources of this problem, I have a "bad feeling" that Internet crime will continue to grow.
The FTC was recently given greater powers to follow Internet criminal activity across borders. Maybe laws like these will enable the "good guys" to start having a more "lasting" effect on the people behind the problem.
DigitalTransactionNews is reporting:
RSA Security Inc. on Wednesday announced its analysts had discovered a powerful new phishing tool fraudsters are selling via online forums and using to hoodwink consumers. The tool, which RSA calls a “universal man-in-the-middle phishing kit,” allows phishers to set up a URL that can interact in real time with the actual content of the Web site of a targeted brand, such as a bank or e-commerce site. In this way, the fraudsters can intercept any data consumers may enter at the log-in or checkout pages of these sites. They then send out phishing e-mails embedded with links that send recipients to the fake URL, where the user can see an organization’s legitimate Web site but where any information he enters will be hijacked by the fraudsters as he types it.
The new tool is especially insidious, says RSA, because of its all-purpose nature. Fraudsters can use it to target any Web site without having to customize or create a tool for each brand. Also, the tool collects all data users enter, including all information the user types in after logging in. Typically, phishing attacks gather only data they request, usually passwords, PINs, or credit and debit card account numbers.
DigitalTransactionNews article, here.
I first read about the man in the middle phishing attack when it was discovered at CastleCops by PIRT (Phishing Incident Reporting and Termination Squad) and reported by Internet crime writer Brian Krebs of the Washington Post, here.
PIRT is a great place to report suspected phish. They have a lot of dedicated personnel that fight phishing!
It's a shame that these Internet crime forums are allowed to continue operating. It's even been reported that one of them is being "hosted" in the Islamic Republic of Iran.
And Internet crime isn't the only problem that Iran is hosting. I'm sure some of our brave troops in Iraq and Afghanistan could attest to that.
Until we go after the sources of this problem, I have a "bad feeling" that Internet crime will continue to grow.
The FTC was recently given greater powers to follow Internet criminal activity across borders. Maybe laws like these will enable the "good guys" to start having a more "lasting" effect on the people behind the problem.
Thursday, December 28, 2006
Federal Trade Commission will fight Internet Crime across Borders
Internet crime of often "elusive" because it crosses borders with "a click of a mouse." To fight this a new law has just been signed by President Bush, which gives the Federal Trade Commission a license to go after the problem at it's source.
In their recommendations to Congress, the FTC wrote:
Broadening Reciprocal Information Sharing and International Investigative Cooperation.
The FTC can now share confidential information in consumer protection cases with foreign law enforcers. The Act further allows the FTC and foreign law enforcement agencies to obtain investigative assistance from one another, while exempting information from foreign agencies from public disclosure laws. This provision addresses the concern expressed by some foreign government agencies that materials they share with the FTC might be publicly disclosed in response to an inquiry under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This concern is reflected in certain foreign laws where the foreign consumer protection agency is not permitted to share information with the FTC unless the information is kept confidential. For example, Canada's Competition Act and the European Unions enforcement cooperation regulation contain such confidentiality requirements.
Enhancing Confidentiality of FTC Investigations.
Prevents notifying subjects of investigations if they may be likely to destroy evidence or move assets offshore.
Protecting Certain Entities Reporting Suspected Fraud and Deception Violations.
The Act protects a limited category of entities from liability for voluntary disclosures to the FTC relating to suspected fraud and deception. This provision is similar to longstanding protections for financial intuitions making disclosures to the FTC and is necessary to encourage reporting of suspected violations to federal agencies.
Allowing Information Sharing with Federal Financial and Market Regulators.
This provision assists the FTC in tracking proceeds of fraud and deception sent through U.S. banks to foreign jurisdictions so they can be returned to victims.
Enhancing Cooperation between FTC and DOJ in Foreign Litigation.
Permits the FTC to work with DOJ to increase the resources relating to FTC-related foreign litigation, such as freezing foreign assets and enforcing U.S. court judgments abroad.
Clarifying FTC Authority to Make Criminal Referrals.
Authorizes the FTC to share information with criminal authorities, which will improve information sharing with foreign agencies that treat consumer fraud and deception as a criminal law enforcement issue.
Report to Congress.
The Act requires the FTC to report to Congress within three years from the date of enactment, describing the use of the FTC's expanded authority and activities under the Act.
US Safe Web Act FTC document, here.
Although this law has just been enacted, it takes away a lot of the barriers to effectively going after individuals and organizations (businesses) that enable the growing problem of cybercrime.
Recently, I've written that technology will never solve Internet crime. It might stop it, or slow it down - but in the end "technology defeats technology."
Holding individuals and organizations accountable is likely to be a lot more effective. This new law breaks down a lot of the barriers that have prevented law enforcement agencies from doing so.
This (in my opinion) is a start in the right direction.
Interestingly enough, Microsoft has taken a similar approach - taking legal action worldwide. Here is a previous post, I wrote about this approach:
Does Microsoft's Approach to Addressing Counterfeiting Make More Sense?
In their recommendations to Congress, the FTC wrote:
Using Internet and long-distance telephone technology, unscrupulous businesses can strike quickly on a global scale, victimize thousands of consumers, and disappear nearly without a trace, along with their ill-gotten gains. For example, deceptive spammers can easily hide their identities, forge the electronic path of their email messages, and send messages from anywhere in the world to anyone in the world. Fraudulent overseas telemarketers can also victimize American consumers and hide their ill-gotten gains in offshore bank accounts.The US Safe Web Act contains the following provisions:
Broadening Reciprocal Information Sharing and International Investigative Cooperation.
The FTC can now share confidential information in consumer protection cases with foreign law enforcers. The Act further allows the FTC and foreign law enforcement agencies to obtain investigative assistance from one another, while exempting information from foreign agencies from public disclosure laws. This provision addresses the concern expressed by some foreign government agencies that materials they share with the FTC might be publicly disclosed in response to an inquiry under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This concern is reflected in certain foreign laws where the foreign consumer protection agency is not permitted to share information with the FTC unless the information is kept confidential. For example, Canada's Competition Act and the European Unions enforcement cooperation regulation contain such confidentiality requirements.
Enhancing Confidentiality of FTC Investigations.
Prevents notifying subjects of investigations if they may be likely to destroy evidence or move assets offshore.
Protecting Certain Entities Reporting Suspected Fraud and Deception Violations.
The Act protects a limited category of entities from liability for voluntary disclosures to the FTC relating to suspected fraud and deception. This provision is similar to longstanding protections for financial intuitions making disclosures to the FTC and is necessary to encourage reporting of suspected violations to federal agencies.
Allowing Information Sharing with Federal Financial and Market Regulators.
This provision assists the FTC in tracking proceeds of fraud and deception sent through U.S. banks to foreign jurisdictions so they can be returned to victims.
Enhancing Cooperation between FTC and DOJ in Foreign Litigation.
Permits the FTC to work with DOJ to increase the resources relating to FTC-related foreign litigation, such as freezing foreign assets and enforcing U.S. court judgments abroad.
Clarifying FTC Authority to Make Criminal Referrals.
Authorizes the FTC to share information with criminal authorities, which will improve information sharing with foreign agencies that treat consumer fraud and deception as a criminal law enforcement issue.
Report to Congress.
The Act requires the FTC to report to Congress within three years from the date of enactment, describing the use of the FTC's expanded authority and activities under the Act.
US Safe Web Act FTC document, here.
Although this law has just been enacted, it takes away a lot of the barriers to effectively going after individuals and organizations (businesses) that enable the growing problem of cybercrime.
Recently, I've written that technology will never solve Internet crime. It might stop it, or slow it down - but in the end "technology defeats technology."
Holding individuals and organizations accountable is likely to be a lot more effective. This new law breaks down a lot of the barriers that have prevented law enforcement agencies from doing so.
This (in my opinion) is a start in the right direction.
Interestingly enough, Microsoft has taken a similar approach - taking legal action worldwide. Here is a previous post, I wrote about this approach:
Does Microsoft's Approach to Addressing Counterfeiting Make More Sense?
Saturday, December 23, 2006
2006 was the Year of Internet Crime - 2007 is predicted to be even worse
Have you noticed spam getting past your e-mail filters lately? You're not alone, experts are saying 2006 was the worst year ever in Internet crime - and it appears - security fixes are being defeated.
Brian Krebbs (Washington Post) is warning:
Few Internet security watchers believe 2007 will be any brighter for the millions of fraud-weary consumers already struggling to stay abreast of new computer security threats and avoiding clever scams when banking, shopping or just surfing online.
Washington Post story, here.
Brian cites that in October 90 percent of all e-mail received was spam. And most spam is a come-on for one fraud scheme, or another.
Since "security fixes" are being defeated pretty quickly by organized criminals - who allegedly hire their own computer security experts - the only viable recourse is to go after the source(s) with the intent to put the people behind it out of business.
Resources allocated to fund the investigation of financial crimes are (normally) not funded very well and the people investigating them are "overwhelmed." Maybe we should take some of the money being spent on developing "fixes" and use it to solve the real problem, which is a social one. Prevention seems to only work temporarily.
Security fixes are needed, but if we don't aggressively go after the sources, the criminals develop countermeasures and we have to start all over again.
After all - it seems that organized criminals and some say, terrorists are flocking to this activity because it's financially lucrative and a lot less dangerous than other criminal activities. Until we make it more dangerous for them, the problem is likely to keep growing.
John Bambenek (Assistant Politics Editor for Blogcritics and academic professional for University of Illinois) recently wrote a compelling essay about this subject, here.
Here is a previous post, I wrote about why we are approaching this problem the wrong way:
Are We Addressing Cyber Crime from the Wrong End
Brian Krebbs (Washington Post) is warning:
Few Internet security watchers believe 2007 will be any brighter for the millions of fraud-weary consumers already struggling to stay abreast of new computer security threats and avoiding clever scams when banking, shopping or just surfing online.
Washington Post story, here.
Brian cites that in October 90 percent of all e-mail received was spam. And most spam is a come-on for one fraud scheme, or another.
Since "security fixes" are being defeated pretty quickly by organized criminals - who allegedly hire their own computer security experts - the only viable recourse is to go after the source(s) with the intent to put the people behind it out of business.
Resources allocated to fund the investigation of financial crimes are (normally) not funded very well and the people investigating them are "overwhelmed." Maybe we should take some of the money being spent on developing "fixes" and use it to solve the real problem, which is a social one. Prevention seems to only work temporarily.
Security fixes are needed, but if we don't aggressively go after the sources, the criminals develop countermeasures and we have to start all over again.
After all - it seems that organized criminals and some say, terrorists are flocking to this activity because it's financially lucrative and a lot less dangerous than other criminal activities. Until we make it more dangerous for them, the problem is likely to keep growing.
John Bambenek (Assistant Politics Editor for Blogcritics and academic professional for University of Illinois) recently wrote a compelling essay about this subject, here.
Here is a previous post, I wrote about why we are approaching this problem the wrong way:
Are We Addressing Cyber Crime from the Wrong End
Monday, November 06, 2006
If You've Really Won the Lottery - Why Are They Asking You to Send Money?
I've written a lot about the various Advance Fee scams out there - and judging from my inbox - the lottery variation of the scam is huge.
I sometimes get four or five notifications that I've won a lottery, or sweepstakes, daily.
Last evening, I read an article written by Linda Leatherdale of the Toronto Sun about a grandmother losing a lot of her hard-earned money as a result of falling for them.
Linda Leatherdale writes:
Toronto Sun story, here.
I've seen the lottery scams, where a high-dollar financial instrument is mailed to the "intended victim," along with instructions to wire the money back - but mailing the smaller amounts ($25 to $50) was an activity that was new to me.
With Spam software that sends these "winner notifications" by the millions - I can see, where this could be a lucrative enterprise for the fraudsters behind this.
I guess the moral of the story is to look for the behavior. I've never won the lottery (I play Mega Millions sometimes) - but if I did - I doubt anyone would be asking me to send money.
It would probably be the other way around, or they would be sending me money!
Linda's article mentions "Phonebusters" as a good resource to educate people on Internet scams. I agree and you can link to them, here.
Down here in the U.S., another good resource is the FTC, link here.
Please note that these "lottery scams" cross borders with the click of a mouse.
You can also report these scams at both of these sites, which is something I highly recommend!
Doing so might save another grandmother out there!
For another post about lottery scams and the sheer amount of spam circulating "winner notifications," link here.
I sometimes get four or five notifications that I've won a lottery, or sweepstakes, daily.
Last evening, I read an article written by Linda Leatherdale of the Toronto Sun about a grandmother losing a lot of her hard-earned money as a result of falling for them.
Linda Leatherdale writes:
But more than anything, she wanted to pay for a university education for her three grandchildren. So she entered the sweepstakes.
Lo and behold, a few months later she received a letter that she had won. Ecstatic, she read what she believed to be an authentic lottery letter, which asked her to send
in $25 to collect her prize.
CASH MAILED OFF
Not trusting giving out personal financial information, via cheques or credit cards, she sent cash. Then other letters arrived -- from the U.S., Australia, New Zealand and other parts of the world. Some invited her to play a new lottery, others said she'd won and to send money to collect her prize.
Toronto Sun story, here.
I've seen the lottery scams, where a high-dollar financial instrument is mailed to the "intended victim," along with instructions to wire the money back - but mailing the smaller amounts ($25 to $50) was an activity that was new to me.
With Spam software that sends these "winner notifications" by the millions - I can see, where this could be a lucrative enterprise for the fraudsters behind this.
I guess the moral of the story is to look for the behavior. I've never won the lottery (I play Mega Millions sometimes) - but if I did - I doubt anyone would be asking me to send money.
It would probably be the other way around, or they would be sending me money!
Linda's article mentions "Phonebusters" as a good resource to educate people on Internet scams. I agree and you can link to them, here.
Down here in the U.S., another good resource is the FTC, link here.
Please note that these "lottery scams" cross borders with the click of a mouse.
You can also report these scams at both of these sites, which is something I highly recommend!
Doing so might save another grandmother out there!
For another post about lottery scams and the sheer amount of spam circulating "winner notifications," link here.
Saturday, October 14, 2006
Counterfeit American Express Gift Cheques (Update)
A couple of weeks ago, readers and other sources started reporting counterfeit American Express Gift Cheques. At the time - this was something new - but more and more seem to be showing up over a wide geographical area.
The best way to protect yourself if you receive one of these items is to call the verification number at 1-800-221-7282.
I've even heard that if you verify them and they turn out to be fraudulent - American Express will make good on them. Please note, I can't personally guarantee this, but I was told by an Amercian Express Representative that it was standard procedure.
Here is my previous post on this subject:
Counterfeit American Express Gift Cheques
If you have any specific details on how these are being circulated, please leave a comment, or drop me a line at edwarddickson@sbcglobal.net.
The best way to protect yourself if you receive one of these items is to call the verification number at 1-800-221-7282.
I've even heard that if you verify them and they turn out to be fraudulent - American Express will make good on them. Please note, I can't personally guarantee this, but I was told by an Amercian Express Representative that it was standard procedure.
Here is my previous post on this subject:
Counterfeit American Express Gift Cheques
If you have any specific details on how these are being circulated, please leave a comment, or drop me a line at edwarddickson@sbcglobal.net.
Monday, July 17, 2006
Armed Robbers Pose as Craigslist Customers
This story reaffirms something we should all know, which is be wary of anyone you know only from the Internet. In a story released on SFGate.com, a seller on Craigslist, selling "hooded jackets" was talked into meeting someone at a local mall. When they arrived for the meeting, they were relieved of their merchandise at gunpoint.
The good news is that the only loss was the "hooded jackets!"
For the full story on SFGate.com, link here.
In my opinion, Craig and Craigslist - who provide a "mostly" free service - have been extremely honest and proactive about protecting their "users" from crime.
Although, I could find nothing about this (new and frightening scam) - here is a link to their warnings about some of the scams attempted on their site. Hopefully this one will make their list soon.
The dangers of meeting someone that you have met only over the Internet have been well documented. Although primarily written in the context of "romance encounters," anyone meeting someone they meet on the Internet needs to be careful and verify (via a trusted source) who they are dealing with before proceeding.
For a resource from the University of Oklahoma (The Police Notebook), which covers this subject - link here.
The good news is that the only loss was the "hooded jackets!"
For the full story on SFGate.com, link here.
In my opinion, Craig and Craigslist - who provide a "mostly" free service - have been extremely honest and proactive about protecting their "users" from crime.
Although, I could find nothing about this (new and frightening scam) - here is a link to their warnings about some of the scams attempted on their site. Hopefully this one will make their list soon.
The dangers of meeting someone that you have met only over the Internet have been well documented. Although primarily written in the context of "romance encounters," anyone meeting someone they meet on the Internet needs to be careful and verify (via a trusted source) who they are dealing with before proceeding.
For a resource from the University of Oklahoma (The Police Notebook), which covers this subject - link here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
